Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.advisorMontaño Moreno, Johannaspa
dc.contributor.authorBecerra Salcedo, Paula Andreaspa
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-06T15:38:39Z
dc.date.available2022-05-06T15:38:39Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.otherTO-21189
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12209/17293
dc.description.abstractTesis de Maestría en Enseñanza de Lenguas Extranjeras que presenta una investigación caso de estudio de tipo cualitativo desarrollado en el programa de inglés para adultos del Centro Colombo Americano en Bogotá. La investigación busca describir el papel de las actividades de reflexión en el ejercicio de los niveles de control de autonomía cuando se crean textos de diversos tipos siguiendo un enfoque de escritura procesual. En este sentido, la investigación pretende analizar en detalle las formas en las que los cinco participantes del estudio ejercen control sobre la administración del aprendizaje, los procesos cognitivos y el contenido que abordan (Beson, 2001). El estudio sugiere la importancia de transformar el paradigma educativo impuesto y lasspa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherUniversidad Pedagógica Nacionalspa
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subjectAutonomíaspa
dc.subjectNiveles de control de autonomíaspa
dc.subjectReflexiónspa
dc.subjectEscritura procesualspa
dc.titlePromoting autonomy through reflection activities : exploring the levels.eng
dc.publisher.programMaestría en Enseñanza de Lenguas Extranjeras con énfasis en Inglés/Francésspa
dc.subject.keywordsAutonomyeng
dc.subject.keywordsReflectioneng
dc.rights.accessAcceso abiertospa
dc.type.hasVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.relation.referencesBaleghizadeh, S. & Mortazavi, M. (2014). The impact of different types of journaling techniques on EFL learners’ self-efficacy. PROFILE Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development, 16(1), 77-88.
dc.relation.referencesBazeley, P. (2007). Qualitative Analysis with Nvivo. London: Sage Publications Ltd.
dc.relation.referencesBell, J. (2005). Doing your Research Project. Buckingham: Open University Press.
dc.relation.referencesBenson, P. (2001). Teaching and Researching Autonomy in Language Learning. Harlow: Logman.
dc.relation.referencesBooth, C. A lesson of point of view… That works. In C. Booth (Ed.), Practical Ideas for Teaching Writing as a Process. Sacramento: Eric.
dc.relation.referencesBoud, D., Keogh, R., & Walker, D. (1985). Reflection: Turning Experience into Learning. London: Kogan Page.
dc.relation.referencesBoyd, E. M. & Fales, A.W. (1983). Reflective learning. Key to learning from experience. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 23(2), 99-117.
dc.relation.referencesBurns, A. (2003). Collaborative Action Research for English Language Teachers. 3rd Edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
dc.relation.referencesCabrales, M., Cáceres, J. M., & Marrugo, I. (2010). La autonomía en el aprendizaje del inglés y su relación con los trabajos independientes asignados a los estudiantes. Íkala, revista de lenguaje y cultura, 15(26), 119-150.
dc.relation.referencesCamelo, M. J. (2009). El mejoramiento cualitativo de la escritura a partir de la metacognición. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, 12, 54-69.
dc.relation.referencesCarr, W. & Kemmis, S. (1986). Becoming Critical. Education, Knowledge and Action Research. London: Falmer Press.
dc.relation.referencesCassany, D. (1999). Construir la Escritura. Barcelona: Grupo Planeta. [Building Writing].
dc.relation.referencesCohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research Methods in Education. London: Routledge.
dc.relation.referencesCotterall, S. (1995). Developing a course strategy for learner autonomy. ELT Journal, 49(3), 219-227.
dc.relation.referencesCreswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Desgin: Choosing among Five Traditions. London: Sage.
dc.relation.referencesCreswell, J. W. (2009). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches. London: Sage.
dc.relation.referencesCroker, R. A. (2009). An introduction to qualitative research. In J. Heigman & R.A. Croker (Eds.), Qualitative Research in Applied Linguistics: A Practical Introduction. London: Palgrave Mcmillan.
dc.relation.referencesD’Aoust, C. (1987). Teaching writing as a process. In C. Booth (Ed.), Practica Ideas for Teaching Writing as a Process. Sacramento: Eric.
dc.relation.referencesDe la Harpe, B. & Radloff, A. (1999). Helping future teachers to be effective learners: Providing in-context learning support for this year Teacher Education students. The Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 24(2), 27-41.
dc.relation.referencesDewey, J. (1933). How we Think. Chicago: Regney.
dc.relation.referencesDiaz, N. M. (2010). Peer editing: a strategic source in EFL students’ writing process. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, 12, 85-98.
dc.relation.referencesFetterman, D. M. (1998). Etnography: Step by Step. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
dc.relation.referencesFreeman, D. (1998). Doing Research: From Inquiry to Understanding. Canada: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.
dc.relation.referencesFreire, P. (1970). Pedagogía del Oprimido. Mexico: Siglo XXI. [Pedagogy of the Opressed].
dc.relation.referencesFreire, P. & Macedo, D. (2005). Literacy: Reading the Word and World. London: Routledge.
dc.relation.referencesGall, M. D. , Borg, W. R., & Gall, J. P. (2003). Educational Research: An Introduction. 7th Edition. White Plains, NY: Logman Publisher.
dc.relation.referencesGass, S. (2002). An interactionist perspective on second language acquisition. In R. Kaplan (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Applied Linguistics, 170-181. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
dc.relation.referencesGray, J. (1987). Introduction. In C. Booth (Ed.), Practical Ideas for Teaching Writing as a Process. Sacramento: Eric.
dc.relation.referencesGrundy, S. (1987). Curriculum: Product or Praxis?. London: Falmer Press.
dc.relation.referencesHabermas, J. (1984). Ciencia y Técnica como Ideología. Madrid: Tecnos.
dc.relation.referencesHolec, H. (1981). Autonomy in Foreign Language Learning. Oxford: Pergamon.
dc.relation.referencesHood, M. (2009). Case study. In J. Heigham & R. A. Croker (Eds.), Qualitative Research in Applied Linguistics. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
dc.relation.referencesHubbard, R. & Miller, P. B. (1999). Living the Questions. Portsmouth: Heinemann.
dc.relation.referencesIzquierdo, A. & Jiménez, S. (2014). Building up autonomy through reading strategies. PROFILE Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development, 16(2), 67-85.
dc.relation.referencesKenny, B. (1993). For more autonomy. System, 21(4), 431-442.
dc.relation.referencesLi, C. C. (1992). A review of the problems of English composition as encountered by senior high school students: From the perspectives of the Joint College Entrance Examination. English Teaching and Learning, 7(1), 7-14.
dc.relation.referencesLiao, M. & Wong, C. (2011). Effects of dialogue journals on L2 students’ writing fluency, reflections, anxiety and motivation. Reflections on English Language Teaching, 9(2), 139-170.
dc.relation.referencesLincoln, Y. S. & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
dc.relation.referencesLittle, D. (1991). Learner Autonomy. 1: Definitions, Issues and Problems. Dublin: Authentik.
dc.relation.referencesLittle, D. (1997). Language awareness and the autonomous language learner. Language Awareness, 6, 93-104.
dc.relation.referencesLittlewood, W. T. (1999). Defining and developing autonomy in East Asian contexts. Applied Linguistics, 20(1), 71-94.
dc.relation.referencesMason, J. (2002). Qualitative Researching. London: Sage.
dc.relation.referencesMarshall, C., & Rossman, G. (2006). Designing Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
dc.relation.referencesMendoza, E. (2005). Current state of the teaching of process writing in EFL classes: An observational study in the last two years of secondary school. PROFILE Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development, 6, 23-36.
dc.relation.referencesMerriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative Research and Case Study Applications in Education. San Fracisco: Jossey-Bass.
dc.relation.referencesMerriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative Research A Guide to Design and Implementation. San Fracisco: Jossey-Bass.
dc.relation.referencesMiles, M. B. & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. London: Sage.
dc.relation.referencesNorton, B. (1997). Language, identity and the ownership of English. TESOL Quarterly, 31(3), 409-429.
dc.relation.referencesO’Malley, J. M. & Chamot, A. U. (1990). Learning Strategies in Second Language Acquisition. Cambirdge: Cambridge University Press.
dc.relation.referencesOxford R. L. (1990). Language Learning Strategies: What every Teacher should Know. Rowley, Mass: Newbury House.
dc.relation.referencesPatton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. London: Sage.
dc.relation.referencesPenycook, A. (1997). Cultural alternatives and autonomy. In P. Benson and P. Voller (Eds.), Autonomy and Independence in Language Learning, 35-53. London: Logman.
dc.relation.referencesPenycook, A. (2004). Critical applied linguistics. In A. Davies & C. Elder (Eds.), The Handbook of Applied Linguistics, 784-807. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
dc.relation.referencesPicón, J. (2012). Promoting learner autonomy through teacher students partnership assessment in an American high-school: A cycle of action research. PROFILE Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development, 14(2), 145-162.
dc.relation.referencesQuintero, L. M. (2008). Blogging: A way to foster EFL writing. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, 10, 7-49.
dc.relation.referencesRader, S. (1987). Introducing teachers to the concept of writing as a process. In C. Booth (Ed.), Practical Ideas for Teaching Writing as a Process. Sacramento: Eric.
dc.relation.referencesRasinski, T. & Padak, N. (1996). Holistic Reading Strategies: Teaching Children who find reading difficul. Englewood cliffs, N.J: Merrill/ Prentice Hall, p. 152-154.
dc.relation.referencesStake, R. E. (1995). The Art of Case Study Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
dc.relation.referencesStevick, E. (1989). Success with foreign languages: Seven who achieved it and worked for them. London: Price Hall.
dc.relation.referencesStrauss, A. & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. London: Sage.
dc.relation.referencesSugarman, D. A., Doherty, K. L., Garvery, D. E., & Gass, M. A. (2000). Reflective Learning: Theory and Practice. Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.
dc.relation.referencesTarone, E. (2007). Sociolinguistic approaches to second language acquisition research 1997-2007. The Modern Language Journal, 91, 837-848.
dc.relation.referencesThomson, C. K. (1996). Self-assessment in self-directed learning: issues of learner diversity. In R. Pemberton et al (Eds.), Taking Control Autonomy in Language Learning, 77-91. Hong Kong: Honh Kong University Press.
dc.relation.referencesTomlin, R. S. & Villa, V. (1994). Attention in cognitive science and second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16, 183-203.
dc.relation.referencesTudor, I. (2001). Visions of Learning in the Dynamics of the Language Classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
dc.relation.referencesVan Lier, L. (1988). The Classroom and the Language Learner. London: Logman.
dc.relation.referencesVygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
dc.relation.referencesWallace, M. (2006). Action Research for Language Teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
dc.relation.referencesWenden, A. (1998). Metacognitive knowledge and language learning. Applied Linguistics, 19(4), 515-537.
dc.relation.referencesWilson, N. & McClean, S. (1994). Questionnaire design: A practical introduction. Ulster: University of Ulster.
dc.relation.referencesWinter, G. (2000). A comparative discussion of the notion of “validity” in qualitative and quantitative research. The Qualitative Report, 4(3-4), March. www.nova.edu/sss/QR/QR4-3/winter.html. Retrived 29 October 2005.
dc.relation.referencesYin, R. K. (1981). The case study as a serious research strategy. Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization, 3(1), 97-114.
dc.relation.referencesYin, R. K. (2003). Case Study Research Design and Methods (3rd ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
dc.relation.referencesYusuf, M. (2011). Investigating relationship between self-efficacy, achievement motivation, and self-regulated learning strategies of undergraduate students: A study of integrated motivational models. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 2614-2617.
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Humanidadesspa
dc.type.localTesis/Trabajo de grado - Monografía - Maestríaspa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_bdcceng
dc.description.degreenameMagister en Enseñanza de Lenguas Extranjerasspa
dc.description.degreelevelMaestríaspa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesiseng
dc.identifier.instnameinstname:Universidad Pedagógica Nacionalspa
dc.identifier.reponamereponame: Repositorio Institucional UPNspa
dc.identifier.repourlrepourl: http://repositorio.pedagogica.edu.co/
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dc.type.versionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aa
dc.rights.creativecommonsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/