Oral fluency and motivation enhancement through Web 2.0 platforms as didactic tools.

Hernández Botina, Julieth Caterine

dc.contributor.advisor	Mellizo Guaqueta, Nelson	spa
dc.contributor.author	Hernández Botina, Julieth Caterine	spa
dc.date.accessioned	2018-05-31T16:07:41Z
dc.date.available	2018-05-31T16:07:41Z
dc.date.issued	2017
dc.identifier.other	TE-21137
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12209/7746
dc.description.abstract	Trabajo de grado realizado para observar, describir y mejorar la fluidez y la motivación de los estudiantes a través de la plataforma Web 2.0 YouTube con estudiantes entre 11 y 13 años del centro de lenguas de la universidad pedagógica nacional en Bogotá. Gracias al uso de distintos medios de recolección e intervención se logró recoger datos e información que evidenciaron un mejoramiento de la fluidez y un incremento de la motivación en los estudiantes. Se demostró un avance positivo, ya que la mayoría de ellos mostraron a través de las clases de inglés una mayor disposición y una mejora en su fluidez oral en la lengua extranjera. Con estrategias colaborativas y a través de diferentes videos de la plataforma YouTube los estudiantes demostraron que adquirieron nuevo lenguaje y expresiones las cuales podían utilizar para expresar sus ideas de manera más clara y concisa.	spa
dc.format	PDF	spa
dc.format.mimetype	application/pdf	spa
dc.language.iso	spa
dc.publisher	Universidad Pedagógica Nacional	spa
dc.rights.uri	https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.source	reponame:Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Pedagógica Nacional	spa
dc.source	instname:Universidad Pedagógica Nacional	spa
dc.subject	Oral fluency	spa
dc.subject	Motivation	spa
dc.subject	Web 2.0 platforms	spa
dc.subject	Collaborative learning	spa
dc.title	Oral fluency and motivation enhancement through Web 2.0 platforms as didactic tools.	spa
dc.type	info:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis
dc.publisher.program	Licenciatura en Español y Lenguas Extranjeras	spa
dc.rights.access	Acceso abierto	spa
dc.rights.accessrights	info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.relation.references	Adams, R., Iwashita, N. &Philp, J. (2014). Peer Interaction and Second Language Learning. New York, USA: Routledge.
dc.relation.references	Bénabou, R., Tirole, J. (2003) Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation. Oxford academic. + Volume 70, issue 3.
dc.relation.references	Bruner, J. (1986). Actual Minds, Possible Worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
dc.relation.references	Bryant, J., Schonemann, N., Karpa, D. (2011) Integrating Service-Learning into the University Classroom. Jones & Bartlett Publishers.
dc.relation.references	Bygate, M. (1998). Speaking. Oxford university press.
dc.relation.references	Bruguier, L., Greathouse Amador, L. (2012) New educational environments aimed at developing intercultural understanding while reinforcing the use of English in experience-based learning. Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Facultad de Ciencias Humanas, Departamento de Lenguas. PROFILE Vol. 14, No. 2, October 2012. ISSN 1657-0790 (printed) 2256-5760 (online). Bogotá, Colombia. Pages 195- 211.
dc.relation.references	Chamot, A., Barnhardt, S., Dirstine, S. Conducting Action Research In The Foreign Language Classroom. Language Resource Center. New York. 1998
dc.relation.references	Covington, M. (1992). Making the grade: A self-worth perspective on motivation and school reform. Berkeley, California.
dc.relation.references	Deci, E. L. (1971). Effects of externally mediated rewards on intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 18, 105–115.
dc.relation.references	Denzin, N., Lincoln, Y. The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research. 2011.
dc.relation.references	Dillenbourg P. (1999) What do you mean by collaborative learning? Collaborativelearning: Cognitive and Computational Approaches. (pp.1-19). Oxford: Elsevier
dc.relation.references	Downes, S. (2005) E learning 2.0. E- learning magazine. Retrieved from http://elearnmag.acm.org/featured.cfm?aid=1104968
dc.relation.references	Fillmore, C.J. (1979). Individual differences in language ability and language behavior. New York. Academic press.
dc.relation.references	Freeman, D. Doing teacher research: from inquiry to understanding. 1998
dc.relation.references	Gutierrez, D. (2005). Developing oral skills through communicative and interactive tasks. Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Facultad de Ciencias Humanas, Departamento de Lenguas Extranjeras. PROFILE Vol 6- 83-96 accepted on August 16th, 2005.
dc.relation.references	Goetz, J., Lecompte, M (1984) Ethnographic and qualitative research design and why it doesn´t work. Published by Academic Press
dc.relation.references	Hawkes, R. (2012). Learning to talk and talking to learn: how spontaneous teacher-learner interaction in the secondary foreign languages classroom provides greater opportunities for L2 learning. University of Cambridge.
dc.relation.references	Herazo, J. (2010). Authentic Oral Interaction in the EFL Class: What It Means, What It Does not. Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Facultad de Ciencias Humanas, Departamento de Lenguas. PROFILE Vol. 12, No. 1, 2010. ISSN 1657-0790. Bogotá, Colombia. Pages 47-61.
dc.relation.references	Jespersen, O. (1966). How to teach a foreign language. OISE-University of Toronto.
dc.relation.references	Kalmbach, D.,Carr, K (2006) Becoming a Teacher through Action Research: Process, Context, and Self-Study. New York: Routledge
dc.relation.references	Lennon, P (1990). Investigating fluency in EFL: A qualitative approach.
dc.relation.references	Levelt, W. (1993). Speaking: from intention to articulation. Cambridge, Massachusetts. The MIT press.
dc.relation.references	Light, D., Polin, D. (2010) Integrating web 2.0 tools into the classroom: Changing the culture of learning. EDC center for children and technology. New York.
dc.relation.references	Mcdonough, JO., Shaw, C. (2003). Materials and methods in ELT. A teacher’s guide. Third edition.
dc.relation.references	Meece, J,. Anderman, L., Anderman, E (2006) Classroom Goal Structure, Student Motivation, and Academic Achievement. Annual Review of Psychology. Vol 57.
dc.relation.references	Newby, T., Ertmer, P. Exploring pre-service teachers' beliefs about using Web 2.0 technologies in K-12 classroom. Volume 59, Issue 3, November 2012, Pages 937– 945.
dc.relation.references	Nugent, T. (2009) the impact of teacher-student interaction on student motivation and achievement. Department of Educational Research, Technology and Leadership. Orlando, Florida.
dc.relation.references	Oxford, R. (1997) Cooperative Learning, Collaborative Learning, and Interaction: Three Communicative Strands in the Language Classroom. The modern language journal. Volume 81, Issue 4 Winter 1997 Pages 443–456.
dc.relation.references	Pacheco, I., Rozo, L., Suarez, E. (2011). Role of cooperative learning strategies in the development of 5th graders‟ speaking skills at George Washington school. Universidad de la Salle. Bogotá. Colombia.
dc.relation.references	Panitz, T. (1996). A Definition of Collaborative vs Cooperative Learning.
dc.relation.references	Redondo, R., Ortega, J. (2015). Motivation: the road to successful learning. Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Facultad de Ciencias Humanas, Departamento de Lenguas. PROFILE Vol. 17, No. 2, July-December 2015. ISSN 1657-0790 (printed) 2256- 5760 (online). Bogotá, Colombia. Pages 125-136
dc.relation.references	Resta, P., Laferrière, T. (2007). Technology in support of collaborative learning. Educational Psychology.
dc.relation.references	Rossiter, M., Derwing, T., Manimtim, L,., R. (2010). Oral Fluency: The Neglected Component in the Communicative Language Classroom. The Canadian Modern Language Review/La Revue Canadienne des langues vivantes,66, 4 (June/juin), 583–606 doi:10.3138/cmlr.66.4.583.
dc.relation.references	Ryan, R.M.; Deci, E.L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American psychologist (Washington, DC), vol. 55.
dc.relation.references	Saldana, J. The coding manual for qualitative researchers. 2008.
dc.relation.references	Seale, C., Silverman, D. Ensuring rigour in qualitative research. The European Journal of Public Health, 1997 - Oxford University Press.
dc.relation.references	Segalowitz, N. (2010). Cognitive bases of second language fluency. New York: Routledge.
dc.relation.references	Thompson, J (2007) "Is Education 1.0 Ready for Web 2.0 Students?," Innovate: Journal of Online Education: Vol. 3: Iss. 4, Article 5.
dc.relation.references	Vallerand, R. J., & Bissonnette, R. (1992). Intrinsic, extrinsic, and amotivational styles as predictors of behavior: A prospective study. Journal of Personality, 60, 599–620.
dc.relation.references	Wankel, C., Blessinger, P. (2013) Increasing student engagement and retention in Elearning environments: web 2.0 and blended learning technologies. Higher education: teaching and learning
dc.publisher.faculty	Facultad de Humanidades	spa
dc.type.local	Tesis/Trabajo de grado - Monografía – Pregrado	spa
dc.type.coar	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_7a1f	eng
dc.description.degreename	Licenciado en Español y Lenguas Extranjeras	spa
dc.description.degreelevel	Tesis de pregrado	spa
dc.type.driver	info:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis	eng
dc.identifier.instname	instname:Universidad Pedagógica Nacional	spa
dc.identifier.instname	instname:Universidad Pedagógica Nacional	spa
dc.identifier.reponame	reponame: Repositorio Institucional UPN	spa
dc.identifier.repourl	repourl: http://repositorio.pedagogica.edu.co/
dc.subject.lemb	Enseñanza del inglés - Plataforma Web 2.0	spa
dc.subject.lemb	Producción oral - Fortalecimiento	spa
dc.subject.lemb	Aprendizaje colaborativo - Videos de youtube	spa
dc.type.version	info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dc.type.version	http://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aa
dc.rights.creativecommons	Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International