Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorDiazgranados Ferráns, Silviaspa
dc.date.issued2014-06-30
dc.identifierhttps://revistas.pedagogica.edu.co/index.php/RCE/article/view/2593
dc.identifier10.17227/01203916.66rce173.200
dc.identifier.issn2323-0134
dc.identifier.issn0120-3916
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12209/6482
dc.description.abstractEn el presente estudio se explora si los estudiantes que atienden instituciones con ambientes escolares de cuidado, en orden y abiertos a la participación estudiantil, demuestran tener menos actitudes de apoyo a la violencia que los estudiantes que atienden instituciones educativas con ambientes que exhiben poco orden, poco cuidado y poca apertura a la participación, después de controlar por variables demográficas e institucionales. Se usan los datos piloto de la prueba Saber 2012 en competencias ciudadanas y modelos de regresiones multinivel con interceptos aleatorios para predecir las actitudes de apoyo a la violencia de 253 estudiantes a partir de los ambientes escolares en que estudian, tal y como fueron descritos por un grupo independiente de 274 pares en 39 instituciones educativas. Los resultados indican que las actitudes de apoyo a la violencia tienen una relación negativa, moderada y estadísticamente significativa con los ambientes de cuidado (p<.001), positiva, moderada y estadísticamente significativa con los ambiente en orden (p=.01) y ninguna relación aparente con los ambientes escolares abiertos a la participación estudiantil. Después de construir una tipología de cuatro ambientes prototípicos cruzando las características de cuidado y orden, se observa que los estudiantes en ambientes autoritarios exhiben las actitudes más altas de apoyo a la violencia del grupo, seguidos por los estudiantes en ambientes negligentes, autoritativos, y por último, con el puntaje más bajo, los estudiantes en ambientes permisivos. Se discuten las implicaciones de estudio para la práctica, así como limitaciones e investigaciones futuras.spa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.format.mimetypetext/htmlspa
dc.language.isospa
dc.publisherEditorial Universidad Pedagógica Nacionalspa
dc.relationhttps://revistas.pedagogica.edu.co/index.php/RCE/article/view/2593/2562
dc.relationhttps://revistas.pedagogica.edu.co/index.php/RCE/article/view/2593/8763
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
dc.sourceRevista Colombiana de Educación; Núm. 66 (2014): Educación Basada en la Evidencia (ene-dic); 173.200spa
dc.subjectClima escolarspa
dc.subjectViolenciaspa
dc.subjectCompetencias ciudadanasspa
dc.titleAsociación entre los ambientes escolares y las actitudes de apoyo hacia la violencia en estudiantes colombianos.spa
dc.subject.keywordsSchool climateeng
dc.subject.keywordsViolenceeng
dc.subject.keywordsCitizenship competenceseng
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.relation.referencesBaumrind, D. (1973). The development of instrumental compe-tence through socialization. En: A.D. Pick (ed.), Minnesota Symposia on Child Psychology (pp. 3-47). Vol. 7. Minneapo-lis: University of Minnesota Press.
dc.relation.referencesBrook, D. W.; Brook, J. S.; Rosen, Z.; De la Rosa, M.; Montoya, I. D. y Whiteman, M. (2003). Early risk factors for violence in Colombian adolescents. The American Journal of Psychiatry160(8), 1470-1478
dc.relation.referencesBrookmeyer, K. A.; Henrich, C. C. y Schwab-Stone, M. (2005). Adolescents who witness community violence: Can parent support and prosocial cognitions protect them from com-mitting violence? Child Development76(4), 917-929. DOI:10.1111/j.1467-8624.20 05.00886.x
dc.relation.referencesBrookmeyer, K. A.; Henrich, C. C. y Schwab-Stone, M. (2005). Adolescents who witness community violence: Can parent support and prosocial cognitions protect them from com-mitting violence? Child Development76(4), 917-929. DOI:10.1111/j.1467-8624.20 05.00886.x
dc.relation.referencesCepeda-Cuervo, E.; Pacheco-Durán, P. N.; García-Barco, L. y Piraquive-Peña, C. J. (2008). Bullying amongst students Asociación entre los ambientes escolares y las actitudes de apoyo hacia la violencia en estudiantes colombianos N.º 66Silvia Diazgranados Ferránspp. 173-200195attending state basic and middle schools. Revista de Salud Pública10(4), 517–528.
dc.relation.referencesChaux, E. (2009). Citizenship com-petencies in the midst of a violent political conflict: The Colombian educational res-ponse. Harvard Educational Review 79(1), 84-93.
dc.relation.referencesChaux, E. (2012). Educación, con-vivencia y agresión escolar. Bogotá: Ediciones Uniandes.
dc.relation.referencesChaux, E.; Lleras, J. y Velásquez, A. (2004). Competencias ciudada-nas: De los estándares al aula: Una propuesta de integración a las áreas académicas. Bogotá: Ediciones Uniandes.
dc.relation.referencesChaux, E.; Molano, A. y Podlesky, P (2009). Socio-Economic, Socio-Political and Socio-Emotional Variables Explaining School Bullying: A Country Wide Mul-tilevel Analysis. Aggressive Behavior, 35, 1-10.
dc.relation.referencesCoie, J.D.; Miller-Johnson, S. y Bagwell, C. (2000). Prevention Science. En A.J. Sameroff, M. Lewis, y S. Miller (Eds.), Hand-book of Developmental Psycho-pathology, pp. 93-112.
dc.relation.referencesCopeland-Linder, N.; Johnson, S. B.; Haynie, D. L.; Chung, S. y Cheng, T. L. (2012). Retaliatory Attitudes and Violent Behaviors among Assault-Injured Youth. Journal of Adolescent Health50(3), 215-220. DOI:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2011.04.005
dc.relation.referencesEccles, J. S. y Roeser, R. W. (2011). School and community influen-ces on human development. En: M. H. Bornstein y M. E. Lamb (eds.), Developmental science: An advanced textbook (pp. 571-643). 6a. ed. Nueva York: Psychology Press
dc.relation.referencesEckhardt, C. I.; Samper, R.; Suhr, L. y Holtzworth-Munroe, A. (2012). Implicit attitudes toward vio-lence among male perpetrators of intimate partner violence: A preliminary investigation. Jour-nal of Interpersonal Violence27(3), 471-491. DOI:10.1177 /0886260511421677
dc.relation.referencesFarmer, T. W.; Estell, D. B.; Leung, M.-C.; Trott, H.; Bishop, J. y Cairns, B. D. (2003). Individual characteristics, early adolescent peer affiliations, and school dro-pout: an examination of aggres-sive and popular group types. Journal of School Psychology41(3), 217-232. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-4405(03)00046-3
dc.relation.referencesFlannery, D. J.; Wester, K. L. y Singer, M. I. (2004). Impact of exposure to violence in school on child and adolescent mental health and behavior. Journal of Com-munity Psychology32(5), 559-573. DOI:10.1002/jcop.20019
dc.relation.referencesFrench, D. C. y Conrad, J. (2001). School dropout as predicted by ISSN 0120-3916 Primer semestre de 2014Revista Colombiana de Educación N.º 66N.º 66196peer rejection and antisocial behavior. Journal of Research on Adolescence11(3), 225-244. DOI:10.1111/1532-7795.00011
dc.relation.referencesGellman, R. A., & Delucia-Waack, J. L. (2006). Predicting school violence: A comparison of violent and nonviolent male students on attitudes toward violence, exposure level to violence, and PTSD symptomatology. Psychology in the Schools, 43(5), 591–598. doi:10.1002/pits.20172
dc.relation.referencesGibson, C. y Levine, P. (2003). The Civic Mission of Schools. Nueva York: Carnegie Corporation of New York. Recupe-rado de: http://www.civicyouth.org/PopUps/CivicMissio-nofSchools.pdf
dc.relation.referencesGoldberg, A.J.; Toto, J. M.; Kulp, H. R.; Lloyd, M. E.; Gaughan, J. P.; Seamon, M. J. y Charles, S. P. (2010). An analysis of inner-city students’ attitudes towards violence before and after par-ticipation in the “Cradle to Grave” programme. Injury41(1), 110-115. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2009.09.024
dc.relation.referencesGuerra, N. G.; Huesmann, L. R. y Spindler, A. (2003). Commu-nity violence exposure, social cognition, and aggression among urban elementary school children. Child Develop-ment74(5), 1561–1576. DOI: 10.1111/1467-8624.00623
dc.relation.referencesHess, D. (2002). Discussing controversial public issues in secon-dary social studies classrooms: Learning from skilled tea-chers. Theory and Research in Social Education 30(1), 10-41.
dc.relation.referencesHess, D. (2009). Controversy in the classroom: The democratic power of discussion. Nueva York: Routledge
dc.relation.referencesHughes, J.N. (2002). Authoritative teaching: Tipping the balance in favor of school versus peer effects. Journal of Psychology, 40, 485-492
dc.relation.referencesJones, S. M.; Brown, J. L. y Aber, J. L. (2011). Two-year impacts of a universal school-based social-emotional and literacy intervention: An experiment in translational developmental research. Child Development 82(2), 533-554.
dc.relation.referencesKellam, S. G. y Langevin, D. J. (2003). A framework for unders-tanding “evidence” in prevention research programs. Pre-vention Science 4(3),137-153.
dc.relation.referencesKelty, S. F.; Hall, G. y O’Brien-Malone, A. (2012). You have to hit some people! Endorsing violent sentiments and the experience of grievance escalation in Australia. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law19(3), 299-313. DOI:10.1080/13218719.2011.561769
dc.relation.referencesKnaul, F. M. y Ramírez, M. A. (2005). Family Violence and Child Abuse in Latin America and the Caribbean: The Cases of Colombia and Mexico. Recu-perado de: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2050694
dc.relation.referencesKokko, K.; Tremblay, R. E.; Lacourse, E.; Nagin, D. S. y Vitaro, F. (2006). Trajectories of prosocial behavior and physical aggres-sion in middle childhood: Links to adolescent school dropout and physical violence. Journal of Research on Adolescence16(3), 403-428. DOI:10.1111/j.1532-7795.2006.00500.x
dc.relation.referencesLaRusso, M. y Selman, R. (2011). Early Adolescent Health Risk Behaviors, Conflict Resolution Strategies, and School Climate. Journal Of Applied Developmen-tal Psychology32(6), 354-362.
dc.relation.referencesLevine, P. (2007). The Future of Democracy: Developing the Next Generation of American Citizens. Líbano: Tufts Univer-sity Press.
dc.relation.referencesLevinson, M. (2012). No Citizen Left Behind. Cambridge, MA: Har-vard University Press.
dc.relation.referencesLuckenbill, D. F., & Doyle, D. P. (1989). Structural position and violence: Developing a cultu-ral explanation. Criminology, 27(3), 419–436. DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-9125.1989.tb01040.x
dc.relation.referencesLuckenbill, D. F., & Doyle, D. P. (1989). Structural position and violence: Developing a cultu-ral explanation. Criminology, 27(3), 419–436. DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-9125.1989.tb01040.x
dc.relation.referencesMager, U. y Nowak, P. (2012). Effects of student participation in decision making at school: A systematic review and synthe-sis of empirical research. Edu-cational Research Review7(1), 38-61. DOI: 10.1016/j.edurev. 2011.11.00
dc.relation.referencesMinisterio de Educación de Colom-bia (MEN) (2004). Resultados Pruebas Saber 2003. Recupe-rado el 26 de septiembre de 2008 de: http://menweb.mine-ducacion.gov.co:8080/saber/
dc.relation.referencesMinisterio de Educación Nacional (MEN) (2004). Estándares Bási-cos de Competencias Ciudada-nas. Formar para la Ciudada-nía Sí es Posible. Lo que Nece-sitamos Saber y Saber Hacer. Bogotá: Espantapájaros Taller.
dc.relation.referencesMusher-Eizenman, D. R.; Boxer, P.; Danner, S.; Dubow, E. F.; Golds-tein, S. E. y Heretick, D. M. L. (2004). Social-cognitive media-tors of the relation of environ-mental and emotion regulation factors to children’s aggression. Aggressive Behavior30(5), 389–408. DOI: 10.1002/ab.20078
dc.relation.referencesNelsen, J. (2006). Positive Discipline. Nueva York: Random House
dc.relation.referencesPatti, J. y Espinosa, A. C. (2007). Citizenship competencies in Colombia: Learning from policy and practice. Conflict Resolu-tion Quarterly 25(1), 109-125.
dc.relation.referencesShadish, W. R.; Cook, T. D. y Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimen-tal and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin
dc.relation.referencesSchwartz, D. y Proctor, L. J. (2000). Community violence expo-sure and children’s social adjustment in the school peer group: The mediating roles of emotion regulation and social cognition. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology68(4), 670-683. DOI: 10.1037/0022-006X.68.4.670
dc.relation.referencesTorrente, C. E. y Kanayet, F. (2007). Contribución de las com-petencias ciudadanas al rompimiento de la violencia en Colombia: Un estudio a nivel nacional. Documento CESO, 15. Bogotá: Universidad de los Andes.
dc.relation.referencesTorney-Purta, J., Lopez, S. V., & Education Commission of the States. (2006). Developing citizenship competencies from kindergarten through grade 12: A background paper for policymakers and educators Education Commission of the States.
dc.relation.referencesValencia, G.D. y Cuartas, D. (2009). Economic exclusion and violence in Colombia, 1990-2008: A review. Perfil de Coyuntura Económica, 14, 113-134.
dc.relation.referencesVelásquez, A. y Chaux, E. (2009). Peace Education in Colom-bia: The Promise of Citizenship Competencies. En: V. Bou-vier (ed.), Peace Initiatives in Colombia. Washington, D.C.: United States Institute of Peace.
dc.relation.referencesVicepresidencia de la República (2008). Indicadores Compara-dos sobre la Situación de los Derechos Humanos y Derecho Internacional Humanitario en Colombia, Enero-Septiembre. Bogotá: Vicepresidencia de la República. Recuperado el 26 septiembre de 2009 de: http://www.derechoshumanos.gov.co/observatorio_de_DDHH/documentos/Indicadores/obs_indicadores_dic2008_090330.pdf
dc.relation.referencesYouniss, J.; McLellan, J. A. y Yates, M. (1997). What we know about engendering civic identity. American Behavioral Scientist40(5), 620–631.
dc.relation.referencesWeiss, C. (1998). Evaluation. Methods for Studying Programs and Policies. Nueva Jersey: Prentice Hall.
dc.type.localArtículo de revistaspa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501eng
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleeng
dc.title.translatedAssociation between school climate and attitudes supporting violence among Colombian Students.eng
dc.description.abstractenglishThis study explores whether students who attend institutions with school environments that are caring, ordered and open to student participation exhibit less supportive attitudes towards violence than students in schools that are less caring, less ordered and less open to student participation, after controlling demographic and institutional variables. Pilot data from the 2012 SABER test of citizenship competences in Colombia is used, and multi-level regression models with random intercepts to estimate the attitudes towards violence of 253 students from 39 institutions, according to the quality of their school environments as described by an independent group of 274 peers from the same schools, are employed. Results show that students’ supporting attitudes towards violence are negatively, moderately and significantly related with caring school environments, positively, moderately and significantly related to ordered school environments  and not related to environments that are open to students’ participation. After constructing a typology of four school climates, based on different values of care and order, evidence shows that students from authoritarian environments exhibit the highest supporting attitudes towards violence, followed by students from negligent environments, then students from democratic envi - ronments, and with the lowest score of all groups, students from permissive envi - ronments. Implications of this study for practice, as well as limitations and future research are discussed.eng
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.rights.creativecommonsAttribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International


Ficheros en el ítem

FicherosTamañoFormatoVer

No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

  • Revista Colombiana de Educación [929]
    Está orientada principalmente a la divulgación de trabajos inéditos de investigación educativa, revisiones sistemáticas de la literatura y estudios teóricos sobre el campo de la educación y la pedagogía.

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0