Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorLopéz Vargas, Omar - asesores_ES
dc.contributor.authorBuitrago González, Nohora Cecilia
dc.date.accessioned2017-08-31T14:43:08Z
dc.date.accessioned2017-12-12T21:36:04Z
dc.date.available2017-08-31T14:43:08Z
dc.date.available2017-12-12T21:36:04Z
dc.date.created2016
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.otherTO-19292es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12209/376
dc.descriptionTesis de maestría en tecnologías de la información aplicadas a la educación, a través de la cual se examina el efecto que produce la implementación de un andamiaje metacognitivo, dispuesto en un ambiente computacional b-learning, en el mejoramiento del logro de aprendizaje y en el desarrollo de las habilidades metacognitivas de los estudiantes; teniendo en cuenta que existen diferencias individuales que dependen del estilo cognitivo en su dimensión dependencia/independencia de campo (DIC). La investigación se llevó a cabo en el Colegio Distrital Delia Zapata Olivella de Bogotá, en la cual participaron 182 estudiantes. La experiencia consistió en estudiar dos unidades de aprendizaje en la asignatura de Física; cada una con los siguientes temas básicos: Energía (Trabajo, potencia y energía) y Mecánica de fluidos (Hidrostática e hidrodinámica); y se desarrolló bajo tres condiciones contrastadas en un ambiente b-learning: 1) presencia en el software de un andamiaje metacognitivo, 2) efecto diferencial que ejerce un andamiaje metacognitivo, sobre el desarrollo de las habilidades metacognitivas de estudiantes con diferentes estilos de aprendizaje en la dimensión DIC, 3) impacto causado por el uso de andamiajes metacognitivos sobre el logro de aprendizaje en estudiantes expuestos a ambientes b-learninges_ES
dc.formatPDFes_ES
dc.language.isospaes_ES
dc.publisherUniversidad Pedagógica Nacionales_ES
dc.subjectMaestría en Tecnología de la Información Aplicadas a la Educación - Tesis y Disertaciones Académicases_ES
dc.subjectInnovaciones educativases_ES
dc.subjectAmbiente Virtual de aprendizajees_ES
dc.subjectMetacogniciónes_ES
dc.subjectEstilos cognitivoses_ES
dc.titleValidación de un andamiaje metacognitivo para favorecer el logro de aprendizaje en estudiantes con diferente estilo cognitivo en la dimensión dependientes e independientes de campo cuando interactúan en un ambiente b-learninges_ES
dc.typeTesises_ES
dc.publisher.programMaestría en Tecnologías de la Información Aplicadas a la Educaciónes_ES
dc.subject.keywordsAndamiajees_ES
dc.subject.keywordsMetacogniciónes_ES
dc.subject.keywordsEstilos cognitivoses_ES
dc.subject.keywordsAmbientes Computacionaleses_ES
dc.subject.keywordsAmbientes B-learninges_ES
dc.rights.accessAcceso abiertoes_ES
dc.relation.referencesAcovelli, M., & Gamble, M. (1997). A coaching agent for learners using multimedia simulations. Educational Technology, 37(2), 44-48.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesAiello, M., & Willem, C. (2004). El Blended learning como práctica transformadora. (U. d. Sevilla, Ed.) Pixel-Bit(23).es_ES
dc.relation.referencesAleven, V., Roll, I., McLaren, B., & Koedinger, K. (2010). Automated, unobtrusive,.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesAlomyan, H. (2004). Individual Differences: Implications for Web-based Learning Design.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesAlonso, C., Gallego, & Honey. (1997). Los estilos de aprendizaje.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesAmstrong, & Priola. (2001). Individual differences in cognitive style and theireffects on task and social orientations of self-managed work teams. Small Group Research. 32(3), 283-312.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesAnghileri, J. (Febrero de 2006). Scaffolding Practices that Enhance Mathematics Learning. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 9(1), 33-52 .es_ES
dc.relation.referencesArguelles, & Nagles. (2007). Estrategias para promover procesos de Aprendizaje Autónomo. Alfaomega Colombiana S.A.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesArguelles, D., & Nagles, N. (2007). Estrategias para promover procesos de Aprendizaje Autónomo. 2a edición.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesArmstrong, S., & Priola, V. (2001). Individual differences in cognitive style and their effects on task and social orientations of self-managed work teams. Small Group Research. 32(3), 283- 312.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesAron, A. (2001). Estadística para sicología. (P. Educación, Ed.) Sao Paulo, Brasil: Prentice Hall.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesArtino, A. R. (2009). Online learning: Are subjective perceptions of instructional context related to academic success? The Internet and Higher Education,, 12(3/4), 117-125.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesAzevedo Guthrie, J. T., & Seibert, D. (2004). The role of self-regulated learning in fostering students’ conceptual understanding of complex systems with hypermedia. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 30, 87-111.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesAzevedo, & Cromley. (2004). Does training on self-regulated learning facilitate students’ learning with hipermedia. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(3), 523-535.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesAzevedo, R., & Cromley, J. G. (2004). Does training on self-regulated learning facilitate students learning with hypermedia? Journal of Educational Psychology. 96(3), 523–535es_ES
dc.relation.referencesAzevedo, R., Cromley, Winters, & Greene. (2006). “Using computers as meta-cognitive tools to foster students’ self-regulated learning” Tech. Inst.,. Cognition and Learning, 3, 97-10.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesAzevedo. (2008). The role of self-regulation in learning about science with hypermedia.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesAzevedo. (2008). The role of self-regulation in learning about science with hypermedia. (I. D. Schraw, Ed.) Recent innovations in educational technology that facilitate student learning, 27-156.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesBagley, & Mallick, K. (1998). Field Independence, cultural context and academic achievement: a comentary. British Journal of Educational Psychology. 68, 581 – 587es_ES
dc.relation.referencesBandura, A. (1997). Sel-eficacy the exercise of control.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesBartolomé, A. (2004). Blended Learning. Conceptos básicos. (U. d. Barcelona, Ed.) Píxel_Bit Revista de Medios y Educación(23), 7-20.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesBaylor, A. (2002). Agent-based learning environments as a research tool for investigating teaching and learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 26(3 ), 227-248.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesBernabé, I. (2006). Promoción de estrategias cognitivas de aprendizaje mediante Webquest en la educación superior. (U. J. Departamento de Educación, Editor) Recuperado el 20015, de http://www.novadors.org/edicions/vjornades/textos/Bees_ES
dc.relation.referencesBliss, J., Askew, M., & Macrae, S. (Marzo de 1996). Effective Teaching and Learning: Scaffolding Revisited. (T. &amp, & L. Francis, Edits.) Oxford Review of Education, , 22(1), 37-61.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesBoekaerts, M., Pintrich, P., & Zeidner, M. (. (2000). Handbook of self-Regulation. AcademicPress.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesBrown, & Palincsar. (1987). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension strategies: A natural history of one program for enhancing learning. En J. D. Borkowski (Ed.).es_ES
dc.relation.referencesBrown, A., & Brandsford. (1983). Learning, remembering and understanding. Handbook of child psychology, 3.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesBruner, J. (1966). Towards Theory of Instruction. Harvard University Press: Cambridge.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesBruner, J. (1978). Towards Theory of Instruction. Harvard University Press: Cambridge.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesBrush, & Saye. (2001). The use of embedded scaffolds with hypermedia-supported student centered learning. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 10 (4), 333-356.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesBurns, H. L., & Capps, C. G. (1988). Foundation of Intelligent Tutoring Systems: An Introduction. (M. P. Richardson, Ed.) Foundation of Intelligent Tutoring.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesBurón. (2002). Ensenar a Aprender: Introducción a la Metacognición.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesBurón. (2004). Enseñar a Aprender: Introducción a la Metacognición. España: Ediciones Mensajero.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesCampanizzi, J. A. (1978). Effects of locus of control and provision of overviews in a computerassisted instruction sequence. Association for Educational Data Systems. AEDS journal, I(12), 21-30.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesCampione, Brown, J. C., Ferrara, & Bryant, N. R. (the zone of proximal development” de New directions for child development: “Children S Leanling in de 1984). The zone of proximal development: Implications for individual differences in learning. En R. &. (Eds.) (Ed.). San Francisco.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesCarretero. (2001). Metacognición y Educación.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesChandrand, S., Treagust, D., & Tobin. (1987). The role of cognitive factors in chemistry achievement. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 24, 145 – 160es_ES
dc.relation.referencesChang, K. E., Sung, Y. T., & Chen, I. D. (2008). The effects of concept mapping to enhance text comprehension and summarization. The Journal of Experimental Education, 71(1), 5–23.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesChang, Sung, & Chen. (2002). The effects of concept mapping to enhance.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesChen, & Macredie. (2002). Cognitive styles and hypermedia navigation: development of learning mode I. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(1), 3- 15.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesChi, Leeuw, & LaVancher, C. (1994). Eliciting self-explanations improves understanding. Cognitive Science, 18(3), 439-477.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesChi, M. T., Siler, S., Jeong, H., Yamauchi, T., & Hausmann, R. (2001). Learning from human tutoring. Cognitive Science, 471-534.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesChi, M., Leeuw, N., Chiu, M., & LaVancher, C. (1994). Eliciting self-explanations.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesChi, M., Leeuw, N., Chiu, M., & LaVancher, C. (1994). Eliciting self-explanations improves understanding. Cognitive Science, 18(3), 439-477.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesChinien, & Boutin. (1993). Cognitive Style FD/I: An important learner characteristic for educational technologists. Journal of educational Technology System, 21(4), 303-311.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesChinien, C., & Boutin, F. (1993). Cognitive Style FD/I: An important learner characteristic for educational technologists. Journal of Educational Technology Systems. 4(21), 303-311.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesChou, C., & Lin, H. (1998). The effect of navigation map types and cognitive styles on learners'performance in a computer-networked hypertext learning system. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 7(2/3), 151-176.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesClark, K. F., & Graves, M. F. (2005). Scaffolding students' comprehension of text. The Reading Teacher, 5(6).es_ES
dc.relation.referencesCoggins, C. (1988 ). Preferred learning styles and their impact on completion of external degree programs. The American Journal of Distance Education, 2 (1), 25-37.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesCrozier. (2001). Diferencias individuales en el aprendizaje: Personalidad yes_ES
dc.relation.referencesCurry. (2003). Review of learning style, studying approach and instructional preference research in medical education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 34(4), 443-454.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesCurry, L. (. (1987). Integratingconcepts of cognitive of learningstyle: A review with attention tops y chometric standards. Canadian College of Health Services Executives.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesDabbagh, & Kitsantas. (2005). Using web-based pedagogical tools as scaffolds for selfregulated learning. Instructional Science , 33(5), 513-540.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesDavis, & Linn. (2000). Scafolding studennts'Knowledges integrations: Prompts reflections in KIE. International Journal of Science Eduaction(22), 819-837.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesDelmastro, A. L. (2008). Procesos metacognitivos y andamiaje docente. Zulia, Venezuela: Euentro educacional.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesDelmastro, L. A. (2010). El andamiaje meteacognitivo en cotextos de aprendizaje. Zulia, Venezuela.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesDettori, & Persico. (2011). Fostering Self-Regulated Learning Through ICT.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesDettori, G., & Persico, D. (2011). Fostering Self-Regulated Learning Through ICT.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesDufresne, & Turcotte. (1997). Cognitive style and its implications for navigation strategies. (B. B. R, Ed.) Artificial Intelligence in Education: Knowledge and Mediain Learning Systems IOS Press, 287-293.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesDufresne, A., & Turcotte, S. (1997). Cognitive Style and its implications for navigations strategies. (B. B. Mizoguchi, Ed.) Artificial Intelligence in Education Knowl learning systemdge and Media, 287-293.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesEngle, R., & Conant, F. (2002). Guiding Principles for fostering productive disciplinary engagement: Explaining and emergent argument in a community of learners classroom. Cognition and Instruction, 20(4), 399-483.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesFerrari, M., & Sternberg, R. (1998). The development of mental abilities and styles. En W. K. Damon (Ed.), Handbook of Child Psychology. Cognition, Perception and Language (Vol. 2 ). Hoboken N. J.: John Wiley and Sonses_ES
dc.relation.referencesFlavell. (1978). Structural process models of complex human behavior. (J. S. Bairnerd, Ed.) Metacognitive development.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesFlavell, J. (1987). Speculations about the nature and development of metacognition. En E. Weinert, & R. Kluwe (Edits.), Metacognition, motivation, and anderstanding.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesFlavell, J. H. (1976). El desarrollo cognitivo. España: Prentice Hall.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesFord, N., & Chen, S. Y. (2000). Individual Differences, Hypermedia Navigation and Learning: An Empirical Study. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 9(4), 281-312.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesGallego, A., & Martínez, E. .. (2007). Estilos de Aprendizaje y E-learning: Hacia un mayor rendimiento académico. (U. P. Cartagena, Ed.) 1 – 10.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesGarrett, Alman, Gardner, & Born. (2007). Assessing Students’ Metacognitive Skills. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 71 (1).es_ES
dc.relation.referencesGhinea, & Chen. (2003). The impact of cognitive styles on perceptual distributed multimedia quality. Journal of Educational Technology, 34(4), 393-406.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesGonzález, & Pienda. (2002). Estrategias de aprendizaje: Concepto, evaluación e intervención. Madrid: Pirámide.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesGonzález, K., Padilla, J., & Rincón, A. (2011a). Teorías relacionadas al b-learning y el papel del docente. Educación y Desarrollo Social,, 5(2), 98-111.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesGoodenough, D. R. (1981). Field Dependent users tend to see a global picture. British Journal of Educational Technology, 34(4).es_ES
dc.relation.referencesGros. (2000). El ordenador invisible. Barcelona: Gedisa.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesGros, B. (2000). El ordenador invisible. Barcelona: Gedisa.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesGurlitt, A., & Renkl, J. (2008). Are high-coherent concept maps better for prior knowledge activation? Journal of Computer Asisted lerarning, 24(5), 407-419.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesHadwin, & Winne. (2001). CoNoteS2: A software Tool for Promoting Self-.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesHadwin, A. F., & Winne, P. H. (2001). CoNoteS2: A software Tool for Promoting Self-Regulation. Educational Research and Evaluation. Vol. 7. No.2-3. pp. 313-334.Regulation. Educational Research and Evaluation. 7(2/3), 313-334es_ES
dc.relation.referencesHair, J., Anderson, R., Tatham, R., & Black, W. (2007). Análisis Multiariante (Quinta ed.). (Pearson, Ed.) España: Prentice Hall.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesHandal, & Herrington. (2004). On being dependent and independent in computer based learning environments. E-journal of Instructional Science and Technology, 7 (2).es_ES
dc.relation.referencesHandal, B., & Herrington, T. (2004). On being and independent in computer based. e-Journal of Instructional Sciency and Technology.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesHannafin, Hill, & Land. (1999). Student-centered learning and interactive: Status, issues, and implication. Contemporary Education, 68(2), 94-99.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesHannafin, R. D. (1999). Introduction to special issue on instructional technology and teacher.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesHederich. (2007). Estilo cognitivo en la dimensión de dependencia-independencia de campo. Influencias culturales e implicaciones para la educación.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesHederich, C., & Camargo, A. (1999). Estilos Cognitivos en Colombia. Resultados en cinco regiones culturales. (CIUP, Ed.) Colciencias.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesHollan, Bederson, & Helfman. (1997). nforation visualization. (L. y. helandel, Ed.) The handbook of Human Ccomputer Interaction, 33-48.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesHolscherl, & Strubel. (2000). Web search behaviour of Internet experts and newbies Computer Networks. 33(1), 7-346.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesIslas, C. (Julio de 2015). LA INTERACCIÓN EN EL BLEARNING COMO POSIBILITADORA DE AMBIENTES DE APRENDIZAJE CONSTRUCTIVISTAS:PERSPECTIVA DE ESTUDIANTES. PíxelBit. Revista de Medios y Educación(47), 7-22.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesJacobson, & Archolidou, A. (2000). The design of hypermedia tools for learning:Fostering conceptual change and transfer of complex scientific knowledge. The journal of the learning Sciences, 9, 145-199.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesJacobson, M. J., & Azevedo, R. (2008). Advances in scaffolding learning with hypertext and hypermedia Theoretical, empirical, and design issues. Educational Technology, Research, and Development,(56), 1-3.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesJacobson, M., & Archodidou, A. (2000). The design of hypermedia tools for learning: Fostering conceptual change and transfer of complex scientific knowledge. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9(2), 145-199.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesJohnson, D., & Johnson, R. (1992). Learning together and alone: cooperation, competition and individualization. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesJonassen. (1989). Hypertext – hypermedia.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesJonassen, D. (1999). Designing constructivist learning environments. (I. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Ed.) Instructional design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory, II, 215-239.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesK.Hall, J. (2000). Field Dependence-Independence and Computer-based Instruction in Geography Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doct.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesKandel, D. B., & Andrews, K. (1987). Processes of adolescent socialization by parents and peers. The International Journal of the Addictions, 22, 319-342.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesKini, A. S. (1994). Effects of cognitive style and verbal and visual presentation modes on concept concept learning in cbi. Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesKirschner, F., & Paas, F. (2009). Individual and group-based learning from complex.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesKirschner, P. A., & Boshuizen, H. P. (2008). Coercing shared knowledge in collaborative learning environments. Computers in Human Behaivor, 24, 403-420.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesKlimenco, O., & Alvarez, J. (2009). Aprender cómo aprendo: La enseñanza de estrategias metacognitivas. Educación y Educadores. , 12 (2p), 12 – 28.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesKramarsk, & Gutman. (2006). How can self-regulated learning be supported in mathematical Elearning environments? Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22(1), 24-33.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesKramarski, B., & Zeichner, O. (2001). Using Technology to enhance mathematical reasoning: Effects of feedback and self-regulation learning. Educational Media International, 38(2/3), 77-82.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesKramarski., & Mizrachi. (2006). Online discussion and self-regulated learning: Effects of instructional methods on mathematical literacy. The Journal of Educational Research, 99(4), 218-230.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesKush, J. (1996). Field dependence, cognitive ability and academic achievement in Anglo-American and Mexican-American students. (Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, Ed.) 27(5), 561- 575.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesKwon, S. Y., & Cifuentes, L. (2007). Using Computers to Individually-generate vs.Collaborativelygenerate Concept Maps. Educational Technology & Society, 10(4), 269-280.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesLand, S., & Greene, B. (2000). Project-based learning with the World Wide Web: A qualitative study of resource integration. Educational Technology Research y Development, 48(3), 61- 78.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesLand, S., & Greene, B. (2000). Project-based learning with the World Wide Web: A qualitative study of resource integration. 48(3), 61-78.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesLanger, E. (1985). Playing the middle against both ends: The usefulness of adult cognitive activity as a model of cognitive activity in chilhood. España: Ediciones Mensajero.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesLee, H., Lim, K., & Grabowski. (2009). Generative Learning Strategies and Metacognitive Feedback to Facilitate Comprehension of Complex Science Topics and Self-Regulation. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 18(1), 5-25.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesLi, D., & Lim, C. (Mayo de 2008). Scaffolding online historicalinquirytasks: A case study of twosecondaryschoolclassrooms. Computers & Education(50), 1394-1410.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesLittle, D. (1999). “Developing learner autonomy in the foreign language classroom: a social interactive view of learning and three fundamental pedagogical principles”. Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses, , 38, 77–88,.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesLiu, M., & Reed, W. M. (1994). The relationship between the learning strategies and learning styles in a hypermedia environment. Computers in Human Behavior, 10(4), 419-434.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesLiu, M., & Reed, W. M. (1995). The effect of Hypermedia-assisted-instruction on second.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesLivingston. (1997). Metacognition: An overview. Recuperado el 2014, de http://www.gse.buffalo.edu/fas/shuell/cep564/Metacog.htm.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesLivingston. (1996). Effects of metacognitive instruction on strategy use of college students. En S. U. Buffalo, Unpublished manuscript.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesLópez Vargas, O., Hederich Martínez, C., & Camargo Uribe, Á. (2012). Logro de aprendizaje en ambientes hipermediales: andamiaje autorregulador y estilo cognitivo. (F. U. Lorenz, Ed.) Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 44(2), 13-26.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesLópez, & Valencia. (2012). Diferencias individuales en el desarrollo de la autoeficacia y el logro académico: El efecto de un andamiaje coputacional. Acta Colombiana de Psicología, 15(2), 29-41,.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesLópez, O., & Hederich, C. (2010). Efecto de un andamiaje para facilitar el aprendizaje autorregulado en ambientes hipermedia. Revista colombiana de educación, 14-39.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesLópez, O., & Triana, S. (2013). Efecto de un activador computacional de autoeficacia sobre el logro de aprendizaje en estudiantes de diferente estilo cognitivo. Revista colombiana de educación(64), 225-244.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesLozano, A. (2006). Estilos de aprendizaje y enseñanza: Un panorama de la estilística educativa. . Mexico : Trillas.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesMaerh, M., & Meyer, H. (1997). Understanding motivation and schooling: Where we=ve been where we are, and where we need to go. Educational Psychology Review, 399-427.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesMateos, M. (2001). Metacognición y Educación. . Buenos Aires: Aique Grupo Editor S.A.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesMayer, & Gallini. (1990). When is an illustration worth ten thousand words? Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 715-726.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesMcCormack, C., & Jones, D. ((1998).). Building a Web-based education system. (J. Wiley, Ed.)es_ES
dc.relation.referencesMcLoughlin, C. y. (2001). The weakest link:. Recuperado el 2015, de Is Web-based learning capable of supporting problem-solving and metacognition?: http://www.medfac.unimelb. edu.au/Ascilite20es_ES
dc.relation.referencesMcNeill, K. L., Lizotte, D. J., Krajcik, J., & Marx, R. W. (2006). Supporting students’ construction of scientific explanations by fading scaffolds in instructional materials. . The Journal of the Learning Sciences, , 15(2), 153-191.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesMelara, G. E. (1996). Investigating learning styles on different hypertexts environments: hierarchical like and network-like structures. Journal of Educational Computing Research , 14(4), 313-328.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesMEN. (2009). Ministerio de Educación Nacional: Aprender y educar con las tecnologías del siglo.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesMessick, S. (1976). Individuality in Learning: Implications of cognitive styles and creativity for human development. (J. Bass, Ed.)es_ES
dc.relation.referencesMolenaar, I., Roda, C., Boxtel, C., & Sleegers, P. (2012). Dynamic scaffolding of socially regulated learning in a computer-based learning environment. Computers & Education,, 59, 515-523.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesMolenaar, I., Roda, C., Boxtel, C., & Sleegers, P. (2012). Dynamic scaffolding of socially regulated learning in a computer-based learning environment. Computer& Education, 59, 515-523es_ES
dc.relation.referencesMolenar, I., & al., e. (2010). Metacognitive scaffolding in an innovative learning arregement.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesMonereo. (1990). Las estrategias de aprendizaje en la educación formal: enseñar a pensar y sobre el pensar. Revista Infancia y Aprendizaje, 50, 3-25es_ES
dc.relation.referencesMonereo, C. (1990). Las estrategias de aprendizaje en la educación formal: enseñar a pensar y sobre el pensar. Infancia y Aprendizaje(50), 3-25.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesMoreno, G. (1998). El desarrollo de habilidades como objetivo educativo. Una aproximación conceptual. Educar. Nueva Era.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesMuria, I. (1994). La enseñanza de las estrategias de aprendizaje y las habilidades metacognitivas. Perfiles Educativos, Perfiles Educativos, No. 65.(65).es_ES
dc.relation.referencesMurrel, P., & Claxton, C. (1987). Experiential Learning Theory as a Guide for Effective Teaching. Counselor Educational and Supervision, 4-14.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesN., D., & A., K. (2005). Using web-based pedagogical tools as scaffolds for selfregulated learning. . Instructional Science , 33(5), 513-540.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesNelson, & Narens. (1990). Metamemory: a theoretical framework and new findings. (B. GH, Ed.) The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 125–173.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesOleana, K., & Alvarez, J. (2009). Aprender cómo aprendo: La enseñanza de estrategias metacognitivas. Educación y Educadores, 12(2).es_ES
dc.relation.referencesOrganista, P. (2005). Conciencia y metacognición. Avances en Psicología Latinoamericana, 23, 77- 89.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesOsorio, L., & Duart, J. (2011). Análisis de la interacción en ambientes híbridos de aprendizaje. Revista Científica de Educomunicación. Revista Científica de Educomunicación, XVII(35), 65-72.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesOsses, Sonia, S. A., & Gálvez, J. (2007). Hacia una educación de calidad en el ámbitocientífico. autonomía en el aprendizaje a través de la metacognición.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesPaas, F., Renkl, A., & Sweller, J. (2004). Cognitive load theory: Instructional implications of the interaction between information structures and cognitive architecture. Instructional Science, 32, 1-8.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesPackard, A. L., Holmes, G. A., Viveiros, D. M., & Fortune, J. C. (1997). Incorporating individual learning styles into computer assisted environments for instruction basic research and statistical concepts. Eastern Educational Research Association(6).es_ES
dc.relation.referencesParis, S., & Newman, R. (1990). Developmental aspects of self-regulated learning. En Educational Psychologist (Vol. 25, págs. 87-102).es_ES
dc.relation.referencesParra, J. (2005). Educacion Virtual: Reflexiones y Experiencias. 3 – 16.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesPascual-Leone, J. (1989). An organismic process model of Witkin’s field dependence/independence. En: Globerson, T. y Zelniker, T.(eds). Human development, 3: Cognitive Styles and Cognitive Development. Norwood.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesPask, G., & Scott, B. (1972). Learning strategies and individual competence. International Journal of Man – Machine Studies, 4, 217-253.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesPea, Wulf, E., & Darling. (2003). Planning for two transformations in education and learning technology. Committee on Improving Learning with Information Technology.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesPea, Wulf, Elliot, & Darling. (2003). Planning for two transformations in education and learning technology. Committee on Improving Learning with Information Technology.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesPeñalosa, & Etal. (julio-diciembre de 2010). Modelo estratégico de comunicación educativa para entornos mixtos de aprendizaje un estudio piloto. Pixel Bit(37), 43-55.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesPintrich, & Groot, D. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology,, 82(1), 33-40.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesPintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self- regulated learning. En P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner, Handbook of self- regulation (págs. 452- 502). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesPintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesPozo, J., Scheuer, N., Pérez, M., Mateos, M., Martín, E., & Cruz, M. (2006). Nuevas formas de pensar la enseñanza y el aprendizaje. Las concepciones de profesores y alumnos. Barcelona: Editorial Grao.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesPulido, O., & Pulido, B. (2012). Diseño de un ambiente b-learning apoyado en estrategias de aprendizaje autorregulado para el estudio de la derivada. . EDUCyT, 198-212.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesPuntambekar, S., & Hübscher, R. (2005). Tools for Scaffolding Students in a Complex Learning Environment: What Have We Gained and What Have We Missed? Educational Psychologist, 40(1), 1–12.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesPuntambekar, S., Stylianou, A., & Hübscher, R. (2003). Improving navigation and learning in hypertext environments with navigable concept maps. Human Computer Interaction, 18 (4), 395-426.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesRayner, S. (2000). International Perspectives on Individual Differences. (U. o. Birmingham, Ed.) Cognitive Styles., 1.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesReiser, B. (2004). Scaffolding complex learning: The mechanisms of structuring and problematizing student work. Journal of the Learning Sciences., 13 (3), 273-304.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesRiding, & Cheema. (1991). Cognitive styles- an overview and integration Educational Psychology. 11, 193-215.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesRiding, R., & Taylor, E. M. (1976). Imagery performance and prose comprehension in 7-year-old children. Educational Studies, 2, 21-27.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesRyan, A. M. (2001). The peer group as a context for the development of young adolescent motivation and achievement. Child Development, 72(4), 1135-1150.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesSaarikoski, L., Salojärvi, S., Del Corso, D., & Ovcin, E. (2001). The 3DE: An Environment for the Development of Learner-Oriented Customised Educational Packages. (Kumamoto, Ed.)es_ES
dc.relation.referencesSabry, K., & Baldwin, L. (2003 ). Web-based learning interaction and learning styles. British Journal of Educational Technology, 34(4), 443-454.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesSalomon, G., Perkins, D., & Globerson, T. (1991). Partners in cognition: Extending human intelligence with intelligent technologies. Educational Researcher, 20(4), 2-9.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesSalonen, P., Vauras, M., & Efklides, A. (2005). Social interaction e what can it tell us about metacognition and co-regulation in learning? European Psychologist, 10(3), 199-208.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesSandoval, Y., & otros. (2012). Las tecnologías de la información y la comunicación en contextos educativos: Nuevos escenarios de aprendizaje. Cali: USC.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesSchunk, D. H. (2001). Social cognitive theory and self- regulated learning. En B. J. Zimmerman y D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Selfregulated learning and academic achievement:Theoretical perspectives. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2, 125- 151.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesShapiro, A. M. (2000). The effect of interactive overviews on the development of conceptual structure in novices learning from electronic texts. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 9, 57"-78.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesShapiro, A., & Niederhauser, D. (2004). Learning from hypertext: Research issues and findings. (L. E. D. H. Jonassen, Ed.) Handbook of Research for Education Communications and Technology(2).es_ES
dc.relation.referencesShen, & Liu. (2011). Metacognitive skills development: A Web-based approach in higher education. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 10(2).es_ES
dc.relation.referencesShen, C., & Liu, H. (2011). Metacognitive skills development: A Web-based approach in higher education. Journal of Educational Technology, 10(2).es_ES
dc.relation.referencesSherry T., C. y. (2002). Cognitive Styles and Hypermedia Navigation: Development and Learning Model. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(1), 3.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesSternberg, R. J. (1985). Cognitive approaches to intelligence. En Wolman (Ed.), Handbook of intelligence. New York: Wiley.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesTaylor, N. (1983). Metacognitive ability: A curriculum priority. Reading Psychology: An International Quarterly(4), 269-278.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesTinajero, & Páramo. (1997). Field Dependence Independence and academic achievement: A reexamination of their relationship. (Vol. 67). (1. 212, Ed.) British Journal of Educational Psychology.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesValcke, M., De Wever, B., Zhu, C., & Deed, C. (2009). Supporting active cognitive processing in collaborative groups: The potential of Bloom’s taxonomy as a labeling tool. Internet and Higher Education, 12, 165-172.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesVan de Pol, J., Volman, M., & Beishuizen, J. (2010). Scaffolding in Teacher–Student Interaction: A Decade of Research. Educational Psychology Review, 22(3), 271-296.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesWang, M. C., Haertel, G. D., & Walberg, H. J. (s.f.). (1990). What influences learning? A content analysis of review literature. Journal of Educational Research, 84.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesWant, & Lin. (2007).es_ES
dc.relation.referencesWeinstein, Husman, & Dierking, D. (2000). Self-regulation interventions with a focus on learning strategies. En P. R. Boekaerts, Handbook of self-regulation (págs. 728-748). San Diego, CA: Academic Presses_ES
dc.relation.referencesWeller, Repman, & Rooze. (1994). The relationship of learning, behavior, and cognitive styles in hypermedia-based instruction: implications for design of HBI. Computers in the Schools, 10, (3-4), 401-420.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesWhite, B., Shimoda, & Frederiksen, J. (2000). Facilitating students' inquiry learning andmetacognitive development through modifiable software advisors. (N. Erlbaum: Mahwah, Ed.) Computers as Cognitive Tools: No More Walls, 97-132.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesWilliams, M. (2001). The effects of conceptual model provision and cognitive style on problem – solving performance of learners engaged in an exploratory learning environment. Humanities and Social Sciences.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesWilson. (1997). Self-regulated learners and distance education theory. Educational Communications and Technology Web site.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesWilson, J. (1997). Self-regulated learners and distance education theory . Recuperado el Revisado en Diciembre de 2015 , de http://www.usask.ca/education/coursework/802papers/wilson/wilson.html.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesWinter, Greene, & Costich. (2008). Self-regulation of learning Withing Computer-based learning enviroments. A critical Analysis. Educational psicholy Review, 20(4), 369-372.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesWitkin, & Goodenough. (1979). Estilos Cognitivos. Naturaleza y Orígenes. Madrid: Ediciones Pirámide.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesWood, D., Bruner, & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring and problem solving. Journales_ES
dc.relation.referencesWu, H. L., & Pedersen, S. (2011). Integrating computer- and teacher-based scaffolds in science inquiry. Computers & Education, 57(4), 2352-2363.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesYoung, J. (1996). The effect of self-regulated learning strategies on performance in learner controlled computer- based instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 44, 17-27.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesZhang, D., Zhao, J., Zhou, L., & Numamaker, J. (2004). Can e-learning replace classroom learning? Communications of the ACM, 47 (5), 75 – 78.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesZhang, M., & Quintana, C. (31 de 01 de 2012). Scaffolding strategies for supporting middle school students’ online inquiry processes. Computers & Education, 58, 181-196.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesZimmerman, & Barry. (1989). A Social Cognitive View of Self-RegulatedAcademic Learning. Educational Psychologist, 3, 329-339.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesZimmerman, B. (2008). Theories of self-regulated learning and academic achievent: An overview and analysis. Mawah, NJ: Erlbaum.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesZimmerman, B. J. (1994). Dimensions of academic self-regulation: a conceptual framework for education. En D. H. Schunk y B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulation of learning and performance. Issues and educational applications.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesZimmerman, B. J. (2002a). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview: Theory into practice. 41 (2), 64- 70.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesZimmerman, B., & Moylan, A. (2009). WhereMetacognition and MotivationIntersect. In D. Hacker, J. Dunlosky& A. Graesser (Eds.). Handbook of Metacognition in Education.es_ES
dc.relation.referencesZimmerman. (2000b). Achieving academic excellence: A self regulatory perspective. En M. Ferrari, The pursuit of excellence trought education. The educational psychology series, 85 – 100.es_ES


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record