Validación de un andamiaje metacognitivo para favorecer el logro de aprendizaje en estudiantes con diferente estilo cognitivo en la dimensión dependientes e independientes de campo cuando interactúan en un ambiente b-learning.

Buitrago González, Nohora Cecilia

dc.contributor.advisor	López Vargas, Omar	spa
dc.contributor.author	Buitrago González, Nohora Cecilia	spa
dc.date.accessioned	2017-08-31T14:43:08Z
dc.date.accessioned	2017-12-12T21:36:04Z
dc.date.available	2017-08-31T14:43:08Z
dc.date.available	2017-12-12T21:36:04Z
dc.date.issued	2016
dc.identifier.other	TO-19292
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12209/376
dc.description.abstract	Tesis de maestría en tecnologías de la información aplicadas a la educación, a través de la cual se examina el efecto que produce la implementación de un andamiaje metacognitivo, dispuesto en un ambiente computacional b-learning, en el mejoramiento del logro de aprendizaje y en el desarrollo de las habilidades metacognitivas de los estudiantes; teniendo en cuenta que existen diferencias individuales que dependen del estilo cognitivo en su dimensión dependencia/independencia de campo (DIC). La investigación se llevó a cabo en el Colegio Distrital Delia Zapata Olivella de Bogotá, en la cual participaron 182 estudiantes. La experiencia consistió en estudiar dos unidades de aprendizaje en la asignatura de Física; cada una con los siguientes temas básicos: Energía (Trabajo, potencia y energía) y Mecánica de fluidos (Hidrostática e hidrodinámica); y se desarrolló bajo tres condiciones contrastadas en un ambiente b-learning: 1) presencia en el software de un andamiaje metacognitivo, 2) efecto diferencial que ejerce un andamiaje metacognitivo, sobre el desarrollo de las habilidades metacognitivas de estudiantes con diferentes estilos de aprendizaje en la dimensión DIC, 3) impacto causado por el uso de andamiajes metacognitivos sobre el logro de aprendizaje en estudiantes expuestos a ambientes b-learning	spa
dc.format	PDF	spa
dc.format.mimetype	application/pdf	spa
dc.language.iso	spa
dc.publisher	Universidad Pedagógica Nacional	spa
dc.rights.uri	https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subject	Andamiaje	spa
dc.subject	Metacognición	spa
dc.subject	Innovaciones educativas	spa
dc.subject	Estilos cognitivos	spa
dc.subject	Ambiente Virtual de Aprendizaje (AVA)	spa
dc.subject	Metacognición	spa
dc.subject	Ambientes computacionales	spa
dc.subject	Ambientes B-learning	spa
dc.subject	Estilos cognitivos	spa
dc.title	Validación de un andamiaje metacognitivo para favorecer el logro de aprendizaje en estudiantes con diferente estilo cognitivo en la dimensión dependientes e independientes de campo cuando interactúan en un ambiente b-learning.	spa
dc.publisher.program	Maestría en Tecnologías de la Información Aplicadas a la Educación	spa
dc.rights.access	Acceso abierto	spa
dc.type.hasVersion	info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dc.rights.accessrights	info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.accessrights	http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.relation.references	Acovelli, M., & Gamble, M. (1997). A coaching agent for learners using multimedia simulations. Educational Technology, 37(2), 44-48.
dc.relation.references	Aiello, M., & Willem, C. (2004). El Blended learning como práctica transformadora. (U. d. Sevilla, Ed.) Pixel-Bit(23).
dc.relation.references	Aleven, V., Roll, I., McLaren, B., & Koedinger, K. (2010). Automated, unobtrusive,.
dc.relation.references	Alomyan, H. (2004). Individual Differences: Implications for Web-based Learning Design.
dc.relation.references	Alonso, C., Gallego, & Honey. (1997). Los estilos de aprendizaje.
dc.relation.references	Amstrong, & Priola. (2001). Individual differences in cognitive style and theireffects on task and social orientations of self-managed work teams. Small Group Research. 32(3), 283-312.
dc.relation.references	Anghileri, J. (Febrero de 2006). Scaffolding Practices that Enhance Mathematics Learning. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 9(1), 33-52 .
dc.relation.references	Arguelles, & Nagles. (2007). Estrategias para promover procesos de Aprendizaje Autónomo. Alfaomega Colombiana S.A.
dc.relation.references	Arguelles, D., & Nagles, N. (2007). Estrategias para promover procesos de Aprendizaje Autónomo. 2a edición.
dc.relation.references	Armstrong, S., & Priola, V. (2001). Individual differences in cognitive style and their effects on task and social orientations of self-managed work teams. Small Group Research. 32(3), 283- 312.
dc.relation.references	Aron, A. (2001). Estadística para sicología. (P. Educación, Ed.) Sao Paulo, Brasil: Prentice Hall.
dc.relation.references	Artino, A. R. (2009). Online learning: Are subjective perceptions of instructional context related to academic success? The Internet and Higher Education,, 12(3/4), 117-125.
dc.relation.references	Azevedo Guthrie, J. T., & Seibert, D. (2004). The role of self-regulated learning in fostering students’ conceptual understanding of complex systems with hypermedia. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 30, 87-111.
dc.relation.references	Azevedo, & Cromley. (2004). Does training on self-regulated learning facilitate students’ learning with hipermedia. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(3), 523-535.
dc.relation.references	Azevedo, R., & Cromley, J. G. (2004). Does training on self-regulated learning facilitate students learning with hypermedia? Journal of Educational Psychology. 96(3), 523–535
dc.relation.references	Azevedo, R., Cromley, Winters, & Greene. (2006). “Using computers as meta-cognitive tools to foster students’ self-regulated learning” Tech. Inst.,. Cognition and Learning, 3, 97-10.
dc.relation.references	Azevedo. (2008). The role of self-regulation in learning about science with hypermedia.
dc.relation.references	Azevedo. (2008). The role of self-regulation in learning about science with hypermedia. (I. D. Schraw, Ed.) Recent innovations in educational technology that facilitate student learning, 27-156.
dc.relation.references	Bagley, & Mallick, K. (1998). Field Independence, cultural context and academic achievement: a comentary. British Journal of Educational Psychology. 68, 581 – 587
dc.relation.references	Bandura, A. (1997). Sel-eficacy the exercise of control.
dc.relation.references	Bartolomé, A. (2004). Blended Learning. Conceptos básicos. (U. d. Barcelona, Ed.) Píxel_Bit Revista de Medios y Educación(23), 7-20.
dc.relation.references	Baylor, A. (2002). Agent-based learning environments as a research tool for investigating teaching and learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 26(3 ), 227-248.
dc.relation.references	Bernabé, I. (2006). Promoción de estrategias cognitivas de aprendizaje mediante Webquest en la educación superior. (U. J. Departamento de Educación, Editor) Recuperado el 20015, de http://www.novadors.org/edicions/vjornades/textos/Be
dc.relation.references	Bliss, J., Askew, M., & Macrae, S. (Marzo de 1996). Effective Teaching and Learning: Scaffolding Revisited. (T. &amp, & L. Francis, Edits.) Oxford Review of Education, , 22(1), 37-61.
dc.relation.references	Boekaerts, M., Pintrich, P., & Zeidner, M. (. (2000). Handbook of self-Regulation. AcademicPress.
dc.relation.references	Brown, & Palincsar. (1987). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension strategies: A natural history of one program for enhancing learning. En J. D. Borkowski (Ed.).
dc.relation.references	Brown, A., & Brandsford. (1983). Learning, remembering and understanding. Handbook of child psychology, 3.
dc.relation.references	Bruner, J. (1966). Towards Theory of Instruction. Harvard University Press: Cambridge.
dc.relation.references	Bruner, J. (1978). Towards Theory of Instruction. Harvard University Press: Cambridge.
dc.relation.references	Brush, & Saye. (2001). The use of embedded scaffolds with hypermedia-supported student centered learning. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 10 (4), 333-356.
dc.relation.references	Burns, H. L., & Capps, C. G. (1988). Foundation of Intelligent Tutoring Systems: An Introduction. (M. P. Richardson, Ed.) Foundation of Intelligent Tutoring.
dc.relation.references	Burón. (2002). Ensenar a Aprender: Introducción a la Metacognición.
dc.relation.references	Burón. (2004). Enseñar a Aprender: Introducción a la Metacognición. España: Ediciones Mensajero.
dc.relation.references	Campanizzi, J. A. (1978). Effects of locus of control and provision of overviews in a computerassisted instruction sequence. Association for Educational Data Systems. AEDS journal, I(12), 21-30.
dc.relation.references	Campione, Brown, J. C., Ferrara, & Bryant, N. R. (the zone of proximal development” de New directions for child development: “Children S Leanling in de 1984). The zone of proximal development: Implications for individual differences in learning. En R. &. (Eds.) (Ed.). San Francisco.
dc.relation.references	Carretero. (2001). Metacognición y Educación.
dc.relation.references	Chandrand, S., Treagust, D., & Tobin. (1987). The role of cognitive factors in chemistry achievement. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 24, 145 – 160
dc.relation.references	Chang, K. E., Sung, Y. T., & Chen, I. D. (2008). The effects of concept mapping to enhance text comprehension and summarization. The Journal of Experimental Education, 71(1), 5–23.
dc.relation.references	Chang, Sung, & Chen. (2002). The effects of concept mapping to enhance.
dc.relation.references	Chen, & Macredie. (2002). Cognitive styles and hypermedia navigation: development of learning mode I. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(1), 3- 15.
dc.relation.references	Chi, Leeuw, & LaVancher, C. (1994). Eliciting self-explanations improves understanding. Cognitive Science, 18(3), 439-477.
dc.relation.references	Chi, M. T., Siler, S., Jeong, H., Yamauchi, T., & Hausmann, R. (2001). Learning from human tutoring. Cognitive Science, 471-534.
dc.relation.references	Chi, M., Leeuw, N., Chiu, M., & LaVancher, C. (1994). Eliciting self-explanations.
dc.relation.references	Chi, M., Leeuw, N., Chiu, M., & LaVancher, C. (1994). Eliciting self-explanations improves understanding. Cognitive Science, 18(3), 439-477.
dc.relation.references	Chinien, & Boutin. (1993). Cognitive Style FD/I: An important learner characteristic for educational technologists. Journal of educational Technology System, 21(4), 303-311.
dc.relation.references	Chinien, C., & Boutin, F. (1993). Cognitive Style FD/I: An important learner characteristic for educational technologists. Journal of Educational Technology Systems. 4(21), 303-311.
dc.relation.references	Chou, C., & Lin, H. (1998). The effect of navigation map types and cognitive styles on learners'performance in a computer-networked hypertext learning system. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 7(2/3), 151-176.
dc.relation.references	Clark, K. F., & Graves, M. F. (2005). Scaffolding students' comprehension of text. The Reading Teacher, 5(6).
dc.relation.references	Coggins, C. (1988 ). Preferred learning styles and their impact on completion of external degree programs. The American Journal of Distance Education, 2 (1), 25-37.
dc.relation.references	Crozier. (2001). Diferencias individuales en el aprendizaje: Personalidad y
dc.relation.references	Curry. (2003). Review of learning style, studying approach and instructional preference research in medical education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 34(4), 443-454.
dc.relation.references	Curry, L. (. (1987). Integratingconcepts of cognitive of learningstyle: A review with attention tops y chometric standards. Canadian College of Health Services Executives.
dc.relation.references	Dabbagh, & Kitsantas. (2005). Using web-based pedagogical tools as scaffolds for selfregulated learning. Instructional Science , 33(5), 513-540.
dc.relation.references	Davis, & Linn. (2000). Scafolding studennts'Knowledges integrations: Prompts reflections in KIE. International Journal of Science Eduaction(22), 819-837.
dc.relation.references	Delmastro, A. L. (2008). Procesos metacognitivos y andamiaje docente. Zulia, Venezuela: Euentro educacional.
dc.relation.references	Delmastro, L. A. (2010). El andamiaje meteacognitivo en cotextos de aprendizaje. Zulia, Venezuela.
dc.relation.references	Dettori, & Persico. (2011). Fostering Self-Regulated Learning Through ICT.
dc.relation.references	Dettori, G., & Persico, D. (2011). Fostering Self-Regulated Learning Through ICT.
dc.relation.references	Dufresne, & Turcotte. (1997). Cognitive style and its implications for navigation strategies. (B. B. R, Ed.) Artificial Intelligence in Education: Knowledge and Mediain Learning Systems IOS Press, 287-293.
dc.relation.references	Dufresne, A., & Turcotte, S. (1997). Cognitive Style and its implications for navigations strategies. (B. B. Mizoguchi, Ed.) Artificial Intelligence in Education Knowl learning systemdge and Media, 287-293.
dc.relation.references	Engle, R., & Conant, F. (2002). Guiding Principles for fostering productive disciplinary engagement: Explaining and emergent argument in a community of learners classroom. Cognition and Instruction, 20(4), 399-483.
dc.relation.references	Ferrari, M., & Sternberg, R. (1998). The development of mental abilities and styles. En W. K. Damon (Ed.), Handbook of Child Psychology. Cognition, Perception and Language (Vol. 2 ). Hoboken N. J.: John Wiley and Sons
dc.relation.references	Flavell. (1978). Structural process models of complex human behavior. (J. S. Bairnerd, Ed.) Metacognitive development.
dc.relation.references	Flavell, J. (1987). Speculations about the nature and development of metacognition. En E. Weinert, & R. Kluwe (Edits.), Metacognition, motivation, and anderstanding.
dc.relation.references	Flavell, J. H. (1976). El desarrollo cognitivo. España: Prentice Hall.
dc.relation.references	Ford, N., & Chen, S. Y. (2000). Individual Differences, Hypermedia Navigation and Learning: An Empirical Study. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 9(4), 281-312.
dc.relation.references	Gallego, A., & Martínez, E. .. (2007). Estilos de Aprendizaje y E-learning: Hacia un mayor rendimiento académico. (U. P. Cartagena, Ed.) 1 – 10.
dc.relation.references	Garrett, Alman, Gardner, & Born. (2007). Assessing Students’ Metacognitive Skills. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 71 (1).
dc.relation.references	Ghinea, & Chen. (2003). The impact of cognitive styles on perceptual distributed multimedia quality. Journal of Educational Technology, 34(4), 393-406.
dc.relation.references	González, & Pienda. (2002). Estrategias de aprendizaje: Concepto, evaluación e intervención. Madrid: Pirámide.
dc.relation.references	González, K., Padilla, J., & Rincón, A. (2011a). Teorías relacionadas al b-learning y el papel del docente. Educación y Desarrollo Social,, 5(2), 98-111.
dc.relation.references	Goodenough, D. R. (1981). Field Dependent users tend to see a global picture. British Journal of Educational Technology, 34(4).
dc.relation.references	Gros. (2000). El ordenador invisible. Barcelona: Gedisa.
dc.relation.references	Gros, B. (2000). El ordenador invisible. Barcelona: Gedisa.
dc.relation.references	Gurlitt, A., & Renkl, J. (2008). Are high-coherent concept maps better for prior knowledge activation? Journal of Computer Asisted lerarning, 24(5), 407-419.
dc.relation.references	Hadwin, & Winne. (2001). CoNoteS2: A software Tool for Promoting Self-.
dc.relation.references	Hadwin, A. F., & Winne, P. H. (2001). CoNoteS2: A software Tool for Promoting Self-Regulation. Educational Research and Evaluation. Vol. 7. No.2-3. pp. 313-334.Regulation. Educational Research and Evaluation. 7(2/3), 313-334
dc.relation.references	Hair, J., Anderson, R., Tatham, R., & Black, W. (2007). Análisis Multiariante (Quinta ed.). (Pearson, Ed.) España: Prentice Hall.
dc.relation.references	Handal, & Herrington. (2004). On being dependent and independent in computer based learning environments. E-journal of Instructional Science and Technology, 7 (2).
dc.relation.references	Handal, B., & Herrington, T. (2004). On being and independent in computer based. e-Journal of Instructional Sciency and Technology.
dc.relation.references	Hannafin, Hill, & Land. (1999). Student-centered learning and interactive: Status, issues, and implication. Contemporary Education, 68(2), 94-99.
dc.relation.references	Hannafin, R. D. (1999). Introduction to special issue on instructional technology and teacher.
dc.relation.references	Hederich. (2007). Estilo cognitivo en la dimensión de dependencia-independencia de campo. Influencias culturales e implicaciones para la educación.
dc.relation.references	Hederich, C., & Camargo, A. (1999). Estilos Cognitivos en Colombia. Resultados en cinco regiones culturales. (CIUP, Ed.) Colciencias.
dc.relation.references	Hollan, Bederson, & Helfman. (1997). nforation visualization. (L. y. helandel, Ed.) The handbook of Human Ccomputer Interaction, 33-48.
dc.relation.references	Holscherl, & Strubel. (2000). Web search behaviour of Internet experts and newbies Computer Networks. 33(1), 7-346.
dc.relation.references	Islas, C. (Julio de 2015). LA INTERACCIÓN EN EL BLEARNING COMO POSIBILITADORA DE AMBIENTES DE APRENDIZAJE CONSTRUCTIVISTAS:PERSPECTIVA DE ESTUDIANTES. PíxelBit. Revista de Medios y Educación(47), 7-22.
dc.relation.references	Jacobson, & Archolidou, A. (2000). The design of hypermedia tools for learning:Fostering conceptual change and transfer of complex scientific knowledge. The journal of the learning Sciences, 9, 145-199.
dc.relation.references	Jacobson, M. J., & Azevedo, R. (2008). Advances in scaffolding learning with hypertext and hypermedia Theoretical, empirical, and design issues. Educational Technology, Research, and Development,(56), 1-3.
dc.relation.references	Jacobson, M., & Archodidou, A. (2000). The design of hypermedia tools for learning: Fostering conceptual change and transfer of complex scientific knowledge. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9(2), 145-199.
dc.relation.references	Johnson, D., & Johnson, R. (1992). Learning together and alone: cooperation, competition and individualization. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
dc.relation.references	Jonassen. (1989). Hypertext – hypermedia.
dc.relation.references	Jonassen, D. (1999). Designing constructivist learning environments. (I. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Ed.) Instructional design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory, II, 215-239.
dc.relation.references	K.Hall, J. (2000). Field Dependence-Independence and Computer-based Instruction in Geography Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doct.
dc.relation.references	Kandel, D. B., & Andrews, K. (1987). Processes of adolescent socialization by parents and peers. The International Journal of the Addictions, 22, 319-342.
dc.relation.references	Kini, A. S. (1994). Effects of cognitive style and verbal and visual presentation modes on concept concept learning in cbi. Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research.
dc.relation.references	Kirschner, F., & Paas, F. (2009). Individual and group-based learning from complex.
dc.relation.references	Kirschner, P. A., & Boshuizen, H. P. (2008). Coercing shared knowledge in collaborative learning environments. Computers in Human Behaivor, 24, 403-420.
dc.relation.references	Klimenco, O., & Alvarez, J. (2009). Aprender cómo aprendo: La enseñanza de estrategias metacognitivas. Educación y Educadores. , 12 (2p), 12 – 28.
dc.relation.references	Kramarsk, & Gutman. (2006). How can self-regulated learning be supported in mathematical Elearning environments? Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22(1), 24-33.
dc.relation.references	Kramarski, B., & Zeichner, O. (2001). Using Technology to enhance mathematical reasoning: Effects of feedback and self-regulation learning. Educational Media International, 38(2/3), 77-82.
dc.relation.references	Kramarski., & Mizrachi. (2006). Online discussion and self-regulated learning: Effects of instructional methods on mathematical literacy. The Journal of Educational Research, 99(4), 218-230.
dc.relation.references	Kush, J. (1996). Field dependence, cognitive ability and academic achievement in Anglo-American and Mexican-American students. (Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, Ed.) 27(5), 561- 575.
dc.relation.references	Kwon, S. Y., & Cifuentes, L. (2007). Using Computers to Individually-generate vs.Collaborativelygenerate Concept Maps. Educational Technology & Society, 10(4), 269-280.
dc.relation.references	Land, S., & Greene, B. (2000). Project-based learning with the World Wide Web: A qualitative study of resource integration. Educational Technology Research y Development, 48(3), 61- 78.
dc.relation.references	Land, S., & Greene, B. (2000). Project-based learning with the World Wide Web: A qualitative study of resource integration. 48(3), 61-78.
dc.relation.references	Langer, E. (1985). Playing the middle against both ends: The usefulness of adult cognitive activity as a model of cognitive activity in chilhood. España: Ediciones Mensajero.
dc.relation.references	Lee, H., Lim, K., & Grabowski. (2009). Generative Learning Strategies and Metacognitive Feedback to Facilitate Comprehension of Complex Science Topics and Self-Regulation. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 18(1), 5-25.
dc.relation.references	Li, D., & Lim, C. (Mayo de 2008). Scaffolding online historicalinquirytasks: A case study of twosecondaryschoolclassrooms. Computers & Education(50), 1394-1410.
dc.relation.references	Little, D. (1999). “Developing learner autonomy in the foreign language classroom: a social interactive view of learning and three fundamental pedagogical principles”. Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses, , 38, 77–88,.
dc.relation.references	Liu, M., & Reed, W. M. (1994). The relationship between the learning strategies and learning styles in a hypermedia environment. Computers in Human Behavior, 10(4), 419-434.
dc.relation.references	Liu, M., & Reed, W. M. (1995). The effect of Hypermedia-assisted-instruction on second.
dc.relation.references	Livingston. (1997). Metacognition: An overview. Recuperado el 2014, de http://www.gse.buffalo.edu/fas/shuell/cep564/Metacog.htm.
dc.relation.references	Livingston. (1996). Effects of metacognitive instruction on strategy use of college students. En S. U. Buffalo, Unpublished manuscript.
dc.relation.references	López Vargas, O., Hederich Martínez, C., & Camargo Uribe, Á. (2012). Logro de aprendizaje en ambientes hipermediales: andamiaje autorregulador y estilo cognitivo. (F. U. Lorenz, Ed.) Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 44(2), 13-26.
dc.relation.references	López, & Valencia. (2012). Diferencias individuales en el desarrollo de la autoeficacia y el logro académico: El efecto de un andamiaje coputacional. Acta Colombiana de Psicología, 15(2), 29-41,.
dc.relation.references	López, O., & Hederich, C. (2010). Efecto de un andamiaje para facilitar el aprendizaje autorregulado en ambientes hipermedia. Revista colombiana de educación, 14-39.
dc.relation.references	López, O., & Triana, S. (2013). Efecto de un activador computacional de autoeficacia sobre el logro de aprendizaje en estudiantes de diferente estilo cognitivo. Revista colombiana de educación(64), 225-244.
dc.relation.references	Lozano, A. (2006). Estilos de aprendizaje y enseñanza: Un panorama de la estilística educativa. . Mexico : Trillas.
dc.relation.references	Maerh, M., & Meyer, H. (1997). Understanding motivation and schooling: Where we=ve been where we are, and where we need to go. Educational Psychology Review, 399-427.
dc.relation.references	Mateos, M. (2001). Metacognición y Educación. . Buenos Aires: Aique Grupo Editor S.A.
dc.relation.references	Mayer, & Gallini. (1990). When is an illustration worth ten thousand words? Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 715-726.
dc.relation.references	McCormack, C., & Jones, D. ((1998).). Building a Web-based education system. (J. Wiley, Ed.)
dc.relation.references	McLoughlin, C. y. (2001). The weakest link:. Recuperado el 2015, de Is Web-based learning capable of supporting problem-solving and metacognition?: http://www.medfac.unimelb. edu.au/Ascilite20
dc.relation.references	McNeill, K. L., Lizotte, D. J., Krajcik, J., & Marx, R. W. (2006). Supporting students’ construction of scientific explanations by fading scaffolds in instructional materials. . The Journal of the Learning Sciences, , 15(2), 153-191.
dc.relation.references	Melara, G. E. (1996). Investigating learning styles on different hypertexts environments: hierarchical like and network-like structures. Journal of Educational Computing Research , 14(4), 313-328.
dc.relation.references	MEN. (2009). Ministerio de Educación Nacional: Aprender y educar con las tecnologías del siglo.
dc.relation.references	Messick, S. (1976). Individuality in Learning: Implications of cognitive styles and creativity for human development. (J. Bass, Ed.)
dc.relation.references	Molenaar, I., Roda, C., Boxtel, C., & Sleegers, P. (2012). Dynamic scaffolding of socially regulated learning in a computer-based learning environment. Computers & Education,, 59, 515-523.
dc.relation.references	Molenaar, I., Roda, C., Boxtel, C., & Sleegers, P. (2012). Dynamic scaffolding of socially regulated learning in a computer-based learning environment. Computer& Education, 59, 515-523
dc.relation.references	Molenar, I., & al., e. (2010). Metacognitive scaffolding in an innovative learning arregement.
dc.relation.references	Monereo. (1990). Las estrategias de aprendizaje en la educación formal: enseñar a pensar y sobre el pensar. Revista Infancia y Aprendizaje, 50, 3-25
dc.relation.references	Monereo, C. (1990). Las estrategias de aprendizaje en la educación formal: enseñar a pensar y sobre el pensar. Infancia y Aprendizaje(50), 3-25.
dc.relation.references	Moreno, G. (1998). El desarrollo de habilidades como objetivo educativo. Una aproximación conceptual. Educar. Nueva Era.
dc.relation.references	Muria, I. (1994). La enseñanza de las estrategias de aprendizaje y las habilidades metacognitivas. Perfiles Educativos, Perfiles Educativos, No. 65.(65).
dc.relation.references	Murrel, P., & Claxton, C. (1987). Experiential Learning Theory as a Guide for Effective Teaching. Counselor Educational and Supervision, 4-14.
dc.relation.references	N., D., & A., K. (2005). Using web-based pedagogical tools as scaffolds for selfregulated learning. . Instructional Science , 33(5), 513-540.
dc.relation.references	Nelson, & Narens. (1990). Metamemory: a theoretical framework and new findings. (B. GH, Ed.) The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 125–173.
dc.relation.references	Oleana, K., & Alvarez, J. (2009). Aprender cómo aprendo: La enseñanza de estrategias metacognitivas. Educación y Educadores, 12(2).
dc.relation.references	Organista, P. (2005). Conciencia y metacognición. Avances en Psicología Latinoamericana, 23, 77- 89.
dc.relation.references	Osorio, L., & Duart, J. (2011). Análisis de la interacción en ambientes híbridos de aprendizaje. Revista Científica de Educomunicación. Revista Científica de Educomunicación, XVII(35), 65-72.
dc.relation.references	Osses, Sonia, S. A., & Gálvez, J. (2007). Hacia una educación de calidad en el ámbitocientífico. autonomía en el aprendizaje a través de la metacognición.
dc.relation.references	Paas, F., Renkl, A., & Sweller, J. (2004). Cognitive load theory: Instructional implications of the interaction between information structures and cognitive architecture. Instructional Science, 32, 1-8.
dc.relation.references	Packard, A. L., Holmes, G. A., Viveiros, D. M., & Fortune, J. C. (1997). Incorporating individual learning styles into computer assisted environments for instruction basic research and statistical concepts. Eastern Educational Research Association(6).
dc.relation.references	Paris, S., & Newman, R. (1990). Developmental aspects of self-regulated learning. En Educational Psychologist (Vol. 25, págs. 87-102).
dc.relation.references	Parra, J. (2005). Educacion Virtual: Reflexiones y Experiencias. 3 – 16.
dc.relation.references	Pascual-Leone, J. (1989). An organismic process model of Witkin’s field dependence/independence. En: Globerson, T. y Zelniker, T.(eds). Human development, 3: Cognitive Styles and Cognitive Development. Norwood.
dc.relation.references	Pask, G., & Scott, B. (1972). Learning strategies and individual competence. International Journal of Man – Machine Studies, 4, 217-253.
dc.relation.references	Pea, Wulf, E., & Darling. (2003). Planning for two transformations in education and learning technology. Committee on Improving Learning with Information Technology.
dc.relation.references	Pea, Wulf, Elliot, & Darling. (2003). Planning for two transformations in education and learning technology. Committee on Improving Learning with Information Technology.
dc.relation.references	Peñalosa, & Etal. (julio-diciembre de 2010). Modelo estratégico de comunicación educativa para entornos mixtos de aprendizaje un estudio piloto. Pixel Bit(37), 43-55.
dc.relation.references	Pintrich, & Groot, D. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology,, 82(1), 33-40.
dc.relation.references	Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self- regulated learning. En P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner, Handbook of self- regulation (págs. 452- 502). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
dc.relation.references	Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational.
dc.relation.references	Pozo, J., Scheuer, N., Pérez, M., Mateos, M., Martín, E., & Cruz, M. (2006). Nuevas formas de pensar la enseñanza y el aprendizaje. Las concepciones de profesores y alumnos. Barcelona: Editorial Grao.
dc.relation.references	Pulido, O., & Pulido, B. (2012). Diseño de un ambiente b-learning apoyado en estrategias de aprendizaje autorregulado para el estudio de la derivada. . EDUCyT, 198-212.
dc.relation.references	Puntambekar, S., & Hübscher, R. (2005). Tools for Scaffolding Students in a Complex Learning Environment: What Have We Gained and What Have We Missed? Educational Psychologist, 40(1), 1–12.
dc.relation.references	Puntambekar, S., Stylianou, A., & Hübscher, R. (2003). Improving navigation and learning in hypertext environments with navigable concept maps. Human Computer Interaction, 18 (4), 395-426.
dc.relation.references	Rayner, S. (2000). International Perspectives on Individual Differences. (U. o. Birmingham, Ed.) Cognitive Styles., 1.
dc.relation.references	Reiser, B. (2004). Scaffolding complex learning: The mechanisms of structuring and problematizing student work. Journal of the Learning Sciences., 13 (3), 273-304.
dc.relation.references	Riding, & Cheema. (1991). Cognitive styles- an overview and integration Educational Psychology. 11, 193-215.
dc.relation.references	Riding, R., & Taylor, E. M. (1976). Imagery performance and prose comprehension in 7-year-old children. Educational Studies, 2, 21-27.
dc.relation.references	Ryan, A. M. (2001). The peer group as a context for the development of young adolescent motivation and achievement. Child Development, 72(4), 1135-1150.
dc.relation.references	Saarikoski, L., Salojärvi, S., Del Corso, D., & Ovcin, E. (2001). The 3DE: An Environment for the Development of Learner-Oriented Customised Educational Packages. (Kumamoto, Ed.)
dc.relation.references	Sabry, K., & Baldwin, L. (2003 ). Web-based learning interaction and learning styles. British Journal of Educational Technology, 34(4), 443-454.
dc.relation.references	Salomon, G., Perkins, D., & Globerson, T. (1991). Partners in cognition: Extending human intelligence with intelligent technologies. Educational Researcher, 20(4), 2-9.
dc.relation.references	Salonen, P., Vauras, M., & Efklides, A. (2005). Social interaction e what can it tell us about metacognition and co-regulation in learning? European Psychologist, 10(3), 199-208.
dc.relation.references	Sandoval, Y., & otros. (2012). Las tecnologías de la información y la comunicación en contextos educativos: Nuevos escenarios de aprendizaje. Cali: USC.
dc.relation.references	Schunk, D. H. (2001). Social cognitive theory and self- regulated learning. En B. J. Zimmerman y D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Selfregulated learning and academic achievement:Theoretical perspectives. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2, 125- 151.
dc.relation.references	Shapiro, A. M. (2000). The effect of interactive overviews on the development of conceptual structure in novices learning from electronic texts. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 9, 57"-78.
dc.relation.references	Shapiro, A., & Niederhauser, D. (2004). Learning from hypertext: Research issues and findings. (L. E. D. H. Jonassen, Ed.) Handbook of Research for Education Communications and Technology(2).
dc.relation.references	Shen, & Liu. (2011). Metacognitive skills development: A Web-based approach in higher education. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 10(2).
dc.relation.references	Shen, C., & Liu, H. (2011). Metacognitive skills development: A Web-based approach in higher education. Journal of Educational Technology, 10(2).
dc.relation.references	Sherry T., C. y. (2002). Cognitive Styles and Hypermedia Navigation: Development and Learning Model. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(1), 3.
dc.relation.references	Sternberg, R. J. (1985). Cognitive approaches to intelligence. En Wolman (Ed.), Handbook of intelligence. New York: Wiley.
dc.relation.references	Taylor, N. (1983). Metacognitive ability: A curriculum priority. Reading Psychology: An International Quarterly(4), 269-278.
dc.relation.references	Tinajero, & Páramo. (1997). Field Dependence Independence and academic achievement: A reexamination of their relationship. (Vol. 67). (1. 212, Ed.) British Journal of Educational Psychology.
dc.relation.references	Valcke, M., De Wever, B., Zhu, C., & Deed, C. (2009). Supporting active cognitive processing in collaborative groups: The potential of Bloom’s taxonomy as a labeling tool. Internet and Higher Education, 12, 165-172.
dc.relation.references	Van de Pol, J., Volman, M., & Beishuizen, J. (2010). Scaffolding in Teacher–Student Interaction: A Decade of Research. Educational Psychology Review, 22(3), 271-296.
dc.relation.references	Wang, M. C., Haertel, G. D., & Walberg, H. J. (s.f.). (1990). What influences learning? A content analysis of review literature. Journal of Educational Research, 84.
dc.relation.references	Want, & Lin. (2007).
dc.relation.references	Weinstein, Husman, & Dierking, D. (2000). Self-regulation interventions with a focus on learning strategies. En P. R. Boekaerts, Handbook of self-regulation (págs. 728-748). San Diego, CA: Academic Press
dc.relation.references	Weller, Repman, & Rooze. (1994). The relationship of learning, behavior, and cognitive styles in hypermedia-based instruction: implications for design of HBI. Computers in the Schools, 10, (3-4), 401-420.
dc.relation.references	White, B., Shimoda, & Frederiksen, J. (2000). Facilitating students' inquiry learning andmetacognitive development through modifiable software advisors. (N. Erlbaum: Mahwah, Ed.) Computers as Cognitive Tools: No More Walls, 97-132.
dc.relation.references	Williams, M. (2001). The effects of conceptual model provision and cognitive style on problem – solving performance of learners engaged in an exploratory learning environment. Humanities and Social Sciences.
dc.relation.references	Wilson. (1997). Self-regulated learners and distance education theory. Educational Communications and Technology Web site.
dc.relation.references	Wilson, J. (1997). Self-regulated learners and distance education theory . Recuperado el Revisado en Diciembre de 2015 , de http://www.usask.ca/education/coursework/802papers/wilson/wilson.html.
dc.relation.references	Winter, Greene, & Costich. (2008). Self-regulation of learning Withing Computer-based learning enviroments. A critical Analysis. Educational psicholy Review, 20(4), 369-372.
dc.relation.references	Witkin, & Goodenough. (1979). Estilos Cognitivos. Naturaleza y Orígenes. Madrid: Ediciones Pirámide.
dc.relation.references	Wood, D., Bruner, & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring and problem solving. Journal
dc.relation.references	Wu, H. L., & Pedersen, S. (2011). Integrating computer- and teacher-based scaffolds in science inquiry. Computers & Education, 57(4), 2352-2363.
dc.relation.references	Young, J. (1996). The effect of self-regulated learning strategies on performance in learner controlled computer- based instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 44, 17-27.
dc.relation.references	Zhang, D., Zhao, J., Zhou, L., & Numamaker, J. (2004). Can e-learning replace classroom learning? Communications of the ACM, 47 (5), 75 – 78.
dc.relation.references	Zhang, M., & Quintana, C. (31 de 01 de 2012). Scaffolding strategies for supporting middle school students’ online inquiry processes. Computers & Education, 58, 181-196.
dc.relation.references	Zimmerman, & Barry. (1989). A Social Cognitive View of Self-RegulatedAcademic Learning. Educational Psychologist, 3, 329-339.
dc.relation.references	Zimmerman, B. (2008). Theories of self-regulated learning and academic achievent: An overview and analysis. Mawah, NJ: Erlbaum.
dc.relation.references	Zimmerman, B. J. (1994). Dimensions of academic self-regulation: a conceptual framework for education. En D. H. Schunk y B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulation of learning and performance. Issues and educational applications.
dc.relation.references	Zimmerman, B. J. (2002a). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview: Theory into practice. 41 (2), 64- 70.
dc.relation.references	Zimmerman, B., & Moylan, A. (2009). WhereMetacognition and MotivationIntersect. In D. Hacker, J. Dunlosky& A. Graesser (Eds.). Handbook of Metacognition in Education.
dc.relation.references	Zimmerman. (2000b). Achieving academic excellence: A self regulatory perspective. En M. Ferrari, The pursuit of excellence trought education. The educational psychology series, 85 – 100.
dc.publisher.faculty	Facultad de Ciencia y Tecnología	spa
dc.type.local	Tesis/Trabajo de grado - Monografía - Maestría	spa
dc.type.coar	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_bdcc	eng
dc.description.degreename	Magister en Tecnologías de la Información aplicadas a la Educación	spa
dc.description.degreelevel	Maestría	spa
dc.type.driver	info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis	eng
dc.identifier.instname	instname:Universidad Pedagógica Nacional	spa
dc.identifier.reponame	reponame: Repositorio Institucional UPN	spa
dc.identifier.repourl	repourl: http://repositorio.pedagogica.edu.co/
dc.type.version	info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dc.type.version	http://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aa
dc.rights.creativecommons	Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International