Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorGarzón Barrios, Marinaspa
dc.contributor.authorGuzmán Benavides, Juan Mauriciospa
dc.coverage.spatialIngalterra, Alemania,spa
dc.coverage.temporalEuropa - Siglo XIXspa
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-13T23:21:16Z
dc.date.available2021-05-13T23:21:16Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12209/13165
dc.description.abstractSe hace un estudio histórico crítico sobre los trabajos experimentales en rayos catódicos hechos por Heinrich Hertz en 1883, publicados en Miscellaneous Papers, y Joseph John Thomson y 1896, publicados en Philosophical Magazine, con el fin de mostrar la forma en que se construyó el concepto de electrón, la descripción detallada de los experimentos brindó una aproximación a las formas experimentales de Hertz y Thomson que además, permitió contrastar sus concepciones sobre los rayos catódicos y reflexionar sobre el papel del experimento en ciencias. Se encuentra que no existió una controversia entre escuelas de pensamiento alemán e inglés por la naturaleza de los rayos catódicos como lo afirma algunos textos históricos, los experimentos de Hertz no pueden ser considerados como fallidos ni los de Thomson como los experimentos cumbre que determinaron la existencia del electrón, esta visión equivoca fue construida a lo largo de los años en los libros de texto y es la que llegó a nosotros.spa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.publisherUniversidad Pedagógica Nacionalspa
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subjectEstudio histórico - Críticospa
dc.subjectElectrónspa
dc.subjectElectromagnetismospa
dc.subjectFísica experimentalspa
dc.subjectHistoria de las cienciasspa
dc.subjectRayos catódicosspa
dc.titleAproximaciones históricas alrededor del concepto del electrón : la actividad experimental relativa al estudio de la naturaleza corpuscular u ondulatoria de los rayos catódicos.spa
dc.publisher.programMaestría en Docencia de las Ciencias Naturalesspa
dc.subject.keywordsHistorical - Critical studieseng
dc.subject.keywordsElectroneng
dc.subject.keywordsExperimental physicseng
dc.subject.keywordsCathodic rayseng
dc.subject.keywordsExperimental physicseng
dc.subject.keywordsElectromagnetismeng
dc.type.hasVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.relation.referencesAyala, M. M. (2006). Los análisis histórico-críticos y la contextualización de saberes científico. Construyendo un nuevo espacio de posibilidades. Pro-Posições, 19-38.spa
dc.relation.referencesBerkson, W. (1974). Las teorias de los campos de fuerza, desde Faray hasta Einstein. Madrid: Alianza editorial.spa
dc.relation.referencesBuchwald, J. (1985). From Maxwell to microphysics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesBuchwald, J. Z. (1995). Scientific Practice: Theories and Stories of Doing Physics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesCathode ray tube. (2021). https://www.crtsite.com.spa
dc.relation.referencesCrookes, W. (1880). On Radiant Matter. The Polular Sciencie Monthy, 13-24spa
dc.relation.referencesDahl, P. F. (1997). FLash of the cathode rays, A History of J J Thomson's Electron. Philadelfhia : IOP Publishing Ltd .spa
dc.relation.referencesDuhem, P. (1906). La théorie physique: son object et son structure. Paris.spa
dc.relation.referencesFalconer, I. (1987). Corpuscles, Electron and cathode rays: JJ Thomson and the "discovery of electron". The British Journal for the History of Science.spa
dc.relation.referencesFalconer, I. (2001). corpuscles to electrons, histories of the electrón. Cambridge: Mit press.spa
dc.relation.referencesGanot, a., & Atkinstone, E. (1887). Elementary treatise on physics: experimental and applied, for use of colleges and schools. New York: Wood and co.spa
dc.relation.referencesGuzmán, R. (2005). ¿Exiten los elelctrones? Revista Colombiana de Filosofía de la Ciencia, vol. VI, 143 154.spa
dc.relation.referencesHarré, R. (1986). Grandes experimentos científicos. Labor SA.spa
dc.relation.referencesHertz, H. R. (1886). Miscellaneous Papers. (D. E. Jones, & G. A. Schott, Trads.) London: Macmillan and Co.spa
dc.relation.referencesLodge, O. (1907). Electrons or the nature and porpierties of negative electricity. London: George Bell and Sons.spa
dc.relation.referencesLodge, O., & Rayleigh, L. (1908). The Ether (Aether) of Space. The Royal Institution Library of Science (Friday Evening Discourses in Physical Sciences) (pág. 5). London: The Royal Institution Library of Science.spa
dc.relation.referencesSegrè, E. (1980). From x-rays to Quarks. New York: Dover publications Incspa
dc.relation.referencesThomson, J. J. (1897). Cathode rays. Philosophical Magazine series 5 vol 44, 293-316.spa
dc.relation.referencesThomson , J. J. (1913). Rays of Positive Electricity. Proceedings of the Royal Society, 1-23.spa
dc.relation.referencesVolker, D., & Manz, F. (1978). Televionen. VGS.spa
dc.relation.referencesWeinberg, S. (1985). Partículas Subatómicas. (A. G. Sánchez, Trad.) New York: Scientific American Books.spa
dc.relation.referencesWhittaker, E. (1910). A history of the theories of aether and electricity. London: Thomas Nelson & Sons Ltd.spa
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Ciencia y Tecnologíaspa
dc.type.localTesis/Trabajo de grado - Monografía - Maestríaspa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_bdcceng
dc.description.degreenameMagister en Docencia de las Ciencias Naturalesspa
dc.description.degreelevelMaestríaspa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesiseng
dc.identifier.instnameinstname:Universidad Pedagógica Nacionalspa
dc.identifier.reponamereponame: Repositorio Institucional UPNspa
dc.identifier.repourlrepourl: http://repositorio.pedagogica.edu.co/
dc.title.translatedHistorical approaches around the concept of the electron : the experimental activity related to the study of the corpuscular or wave nature of cathode rays.eng
dc.description.abstractenglishA critical historical study is made of the experimental work on cathode rays made by Heinrich Hertz in 1883, published in Miscellaneous Papers, and Joseph John Thomson and 1896, published in Philosophical Magazine, in order to show how the concept was constructed. electron, the detailed description of the experiments provided an approach to the experimental forms of Hertz and Thomson that also allowed to contrast their conceptions about cathode rays and reflect on the role of experiment in science. It is found that there was no controversy between the German and English schools of thought over the nature of cathode rays as affirmed by some historical texts, Hertz's experiments cannot be considered as failed nor Thomson's as the peak experiments that determined the existence of the electron, this wrong view was constructed over the years in textbooks and is the one that came down to us.eng
dc.rights.creativecommonsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/