An EFL textbook content analysis : gender stereotypes and gender equality.

Cortés Jaimes, Camila Alexandra; Díaz Alayón, Camila Alejandra

dc.contributor.advisor	Ayala Zárate, Jair	spa
dc.contributor.author	Cortés Jaimes, Camila Alexandra	spa
dc.contributor.author	Díaz Alayón, Camila Alejandra	spa
dc.coverage.spatial	Colombia	spa
dc.coverage.temporal	2020	spa
dc.date.accessioned	2020-08-26T16:50:00Z
dc.date.available	2020-08-26T16:50:00Z
dc.date.issued	2020
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12209/12375
dc.description.abstract	Este proyecto de investigación reporta un estudio de carácter mixto (cuantitativo y cualitativo) guiado por la metodología de Análisis de Contenido, bajo la perspectiva crítica feminista. El objetivo principal de este estudio fue analizar en términos de estereotipos de género el contenido (textos e imágenes) de los libros de texto English, Please! 10th y Way to go 7th, diseñados y publicados por el Ministerio de Educación Colombiano. Los datos fueron recolectados y organizados en rejillas y checklist previamente piloteadas. El análisis llevado a cabo estuvo compuesto por seis momentos diferentes: determinación de unidades, muestreo, registro, delimitación, inferencia y narración.	spa
dc.format.mimetype	application/pdf	spa
dc.language.iso	eng
dc.publisher	Universidad Pedagógica Nacional	spa
dc.rights.uri	https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subject	Género	spa
dc.subject	Estereotipos de género	spa
dc.subject	Equidad	spa
dc.subject	ILE libros de texto	spa
dc.subject	Análisis de contenido	spa
dc.title	An EFL textbook content analysis : gender stereotypes and gender equality.	spa
dc.publisher.program	Maestría en Enseñanza de Lenguas Extranjeras con énfasis en Inglés/Francés	spa
dc.subject.keywords	Gender	eng
dc.subject.keywords	Gender stereotypes	eng
dc.subject.keywords	Equity	eng
dc.subject.keywords	Gender equality	eng
dc.subject.keywords	EFL textbooks	eng
dc.subject.keywords	Content analysis	eng
dc.rights.access	Acceso abierto	spa
dc.type.hasVersion	info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dc.rights.accessrights	info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.accessrights	http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.relation.references	Aigenere, M. (1999). Análisis de contenido: una introducción. Revista electrónica La Sociología en sus Escenarios, 2 (3), 1-52. Retrieved from https://aprendeenlinea.udea.edu.co/revistas/index.php/ceo/article/view/1550
dc.relation.references	Alcaldía de Bogotá. (2010). Boletín 25. Lesbianas, gays, bisexuales y transgeneristas en cifras. Colombia.
dc.relation.references	Almeida, F., Faria, D., Queirós, A. (2017). Strengths and Limitations of Qualitative and Quantitative Research Methods. European Journal of Education Studies, (3), 369-387. DOI: http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.887089
dc.relation.references	Annandale, E., & Clark, J. (1996). What is gender? Feminist theory and the sociology of human reproduction. Sociology of Health & Illness, (18), 1, 17-44.
dc.relation.references	Baiqiang, T. (2008). Identifying and combating sexism in EFL textbooks- with a case study into China [archivo PDF]. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED502011.pdf
dc.relation.references	Barnard, M. (2002). Fashion as communication (2nd Ed.). New York: Routledge.
dc.relation.references	Beauvoir, S. (1989). The second sex, New York: Vintage Books.
dc.relation.references	Beltrán-Castillo, M. J. (2018). Racismo indeleble y textos escolares de ciencias naturales colombianos (2000-2010). Educación y Educadores, 21(2), 285-303. DOI:http://doi.org/10.5294/edu.2018.21.2.6
dc.relation.references	Bem, S. L. (1981). Gender schema theory: A cognitive account of sex typing. Psychological Review, 88(4), 354-364. Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/rev/index.aspx
dc.relation.references	Blair, K.L. & Hoskin, R.A. (2015). Contemporary understandings of femme identities and related experiences of discrimination. Psychology & Sexuality. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1080/19419899.2015.1053824
dc.relation.references	Boettger, R. & Palmer, L. (2011). Quantitative Content Analysis: Its Use in Technical Communication. Professional Communication. IEEE Transactions on professional communication, 53(4): 346-357. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2010.2077450
dc.relation.references	Borkan, J. (2004). Mixed Methods Studies: A Foundation for Primary Care Research. Annals of Family Medicine, 2 (1), 4–6.
dc.relation.references	Brugeilles, C. & Cromer, S. (2009). Promoting gender equality through textbooks: A methodological guide. Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization.
dc.relation.references	Brugeilles, C. & Cromer, S. (2009b). Analyzing Gender Representations in school textbooks. Paris: CEPED.
dc.relation.references	Bryman, A. (1988). Quantity and Quality in Social Research. London: Routledge.
dc.relation.references	Bussey, K., & Bandura, A. (1992). Self-regulatory mechanisms governing gender development. Child Development, 63, 1236-1250.
dc.relation.references	Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge.
dc.relation.references	Byrd, P. (2001). "Textbooks: Evaluation for selection and analysis for implementation." In M. C. Murcia (Ed.), Teaching English as a second or foreign language. Boston: Heinle, Cengage Learning. 415-427.
dc.relation.references	Campbell, T. (2002). La Justicia: Los principales debates contemporáneos. Barcelona: Editorial Gedisa.
dc.relation.references	Castañeda, A. (2012). EFL women-learners construction of the discourse of egalitarianism and knowledge in online talk-in-interaction. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, 14 (1), 163-179.
dc.relation.references	Castañeda-Peña, H. (2008). 'I said it!' 'I'm first!’ Gender and language-learner identities. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, 10, 112-125
dc.relation.references	Code, L. (1991). What can she know? Feminist theory and the construction of knowledge. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
dc.relation.references	Code, L. (1991). What can she know? Feminist theory and the construction of knowledge. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
dc.relation.references	Collins, P. (2008). Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment. London: Routledge.
dc.relation.references	Cortazzi, M., & Jin, L. (1999). “Cultural mirrors materials and methods in the EFL classroom.” In: E. Hinkel (ed.), Culture in second language teaching and learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 196
dc.relation.references	Connell, R. (2011). Confronting Equality: Gender, knowledge and global change. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
dc.relation.references	Council of Europe. (2016). Combating gender stereotypes and sexism in and through education. Retrieved from https://rm.coe.int/1680643799
dc.relation.references	Creswell, J.W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
dc.relation.references	Creswell, J., & Plano Clark, V. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
dc.relation.references	Cunningsworth, A. (1995). Choosing your Coursebook. Macmillan: Heineman.
dc.relation.references	Cunningworth, A. (1984). Evaluating and selecting EFL materials. London: Heinemann.
dc.relation.references	Denzin, N. & Lincoln, Y. (2005). Introduction: The Discipline and Practice of Qualitative Research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.). The Sage handbook of qualitative research, 1–32.
dc.relation.references	De Saxe, J.G. (2014). What's Critical Feminism doing in a Field Like Teacher Education?. Multidisciplinary Journal of Gender Studies, 3(3), 530-555. DOI: http://doi.org/10.4471/generos.2014.45
dc.relation.references	Duran, N. (2006). Exploring gender differences in the EFL classroom. Colombian Applied Linguistic Journal. (8), 123-136. ISSN 0123-4641.
dc.relation.references	Eagly, A., & Wood, W. (2012). Social role theory. Handbook of theories in social psychology. 2. 458-476. DOI: http://doi.org/10.4135/9781446249222.n49
dc.relation.references	Edwards, L. R. (1984). Psyche as Hero: Female Heroism and Fictional Form. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan UP.
dc.relation.references	Eldeman, Lee (1995) Queer Theory: Unstating Desire, GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies, Vol 2, 343-6.
dc.relation.references	Fadhila, Y & Yan, M. (2017). The Representation of Gender in English Textbooks in Indonesia. Language Circle: Journal of Language and Literature, Vol 12 (1), 91-101.
dc.relation.references	Foucault, M. (1992). Microfísica del poder. Madrid: Las Ediciones de la Piqueta.
dc.relation.references	Fraser, N. (1986). “¿Qué tiene de crítica la teoría crítica? Habermas y la cuestión de género”, Bogotá: Universidad de los Andes.
dc.relation.references	Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogía del Oprimido. Madrid: Siglo XXI
dc.relation.references	Gailey, T. (2017). Gender Roles and Hero Myths: Can Gender Inequality Ever Be Justified? Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/317237452
dc.relation.references	Graves, K. (2000). Designing Language Course, a Guide for Teachers. Boston: Heinle. Cengage Learning.
dc.relation.references	Ghorbani, L. (2009). An Investigation of the Manifestation of Sexism in EFL/ESL Textbooks. Iran: Islamic Azad University of Bandar Abba.
dc.relation.references	Gomez, L. (1997). An Introduction to Object Relations Theory. London: Free Association Press. ISBN 1-85343-347-0
dc.relation.references	Hall, M. (2014). Gender representation in current EFL textbooks in Iranian secondary schools. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 5(2), 253-261
dc.relation.references	Halpern, D. F., Benbow, C. P., Geary, D. C., Gur, R. C., Hyde, J. S., & Gernsbacher, M. A. (2007). The Science of Sex Differences in Science and Mathematics. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 8 (1), 1–51. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1529-1006.2007.00032.x
dc.relation.references	Hamilton, M., Anderson, D., Broaddus, M., & Young, K. (2006). Gender stereotyping and under-representation of female characters in 200 popular children‘s picture books: A twenty-first-century update. Sex Roles, 55(11-12), 757-765. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-006-9128-6
dc.relation.references	Hancock, B. (1998). An introduction to Qualitative Research. UK: Trent Focus Group.
dc.relation.references	Hatch, A. (2004). Deciding to Do Qualitative Study. Doing Qualitative Research in Education Settings. New York: State University of New York.
dc.relation.references	Harding, S. (2004). The Feminist Standpoint Theory Reader. New York and London: Routledge.
dc.relation.references	Herrera, D. (2012). Children as subjects with rights in EFL textbooks. Colombia. Appl. Linguist. J. [online]. 2012, vol.14, n.1, pp.45-59. ISSN 0123-4641.
dc.relation.references	Hirschman, E., & Brunswick, N. (2002). "Hair as Attribute, Hair as Symbol, Hair as Self." Gender and Consumer Behavior, (6), 355- 366.
dc.relation.references	Hutchinson, T., & Torres, E. (1994). The textbook as agent of change. ELT Journal, 48 (4), 315–328.
dc.relation.references	James, R., & Baldwin, G (1997). Tutoring and demonstrating: A guide for the University of Melbourne, Centre for the Study of Higher Education. University of Melbourne.
dc.relation.references	Jule, A. (2018). Speaking Up: Understanding Language and Gender (1st Ed.). Bristol: Multilingual Matters. DOI: https://doi.org/10-32422/mv.1582
dc.relation.references	Kincheloe, J., & McLaren. P. (2000). Rethinking critical theory and qualitative research. Key Works in Critical Pedagogy. Thousand Oaks, 303-342
dc.relation.references	Knotts, G., & Jackson, J. (2007). Doing Dress and the Construction of Women's Gender Identity. Journal of Occupational Science. 14. 100-107. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2007.9686590
dc.relation.references	Krippendorff, K. (2012). Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology (3rd Ed.). London: SAGE.
dc.relation.references	Lagarde, M. (1997). Género y feminismo. Desarrollo humano y democracia. Madrid: Horas y horas la Editorial.
dc.relation.references	Law, K. W. K., & Chan, A. H. N. (2004). Gender role stereotyping in Hong Kong’s primary school: Chinese language subject textbooks. Asian Journal of Women’s Studies, 10 (1), 49-69.
dc.relation.references	Lee, J. F. (2014). A hidden curriculum in Japanese EFL textbooks: Gender representation. Linguistics and Education, 26, 39-53
dc.relation.references	Lee, J. F., & Collins, P. (2008). Gender voices in Hong Kong English textbooks: Some past and current practices. Springer Science Business Media, 59,127-137 DOI: http://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-008-9414-6
dc.relation.references	Leedy, P. D. (1993). Practical research: planning and design. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
dc.relation.references	Litosseliti, L. (2006). Gender and Language Theory and Practice. London: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203784792
dc.relation.references	Litosseliti, L. (2006). Gender and language: Theory and practice. New York: Hodder Arnold.
dc.relation.references	Manning, J. (2010). "The Sociology of Hair: Hair Symbolism Among College Students," Social Sciences Journal: (10) Retrieved from https://repository.wcsu.edu/ssj/vol10/iss1/11
dc.relation.references	Marín, A. (2015). Los Estereotipos de Género en el Contexto de la Escuela Con Respecto a las Proyecciones Profesionales y Laborales de los y las Adolescentes de Educación Media de IED VILLA RICA. Bogotá: Universidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas.
dc.relation.references	Martin, W., & Bridgmon, K. (2012). Quantitative and statistical research methods: from hypothesis to results. New Jersey, USA: Jossey-Bass.
dc.relation.references	Ministerio de Educación Nacional. (2015). Colombia Aprende. Bogotá: MEN. Retrieved from http://aprende.colombiaaprende.edu.co/es/node/86745
dc.relation.references	Ministerio de Educación Nacional. (2019). Porcentaje de matrícula oficial con conexión a internet. Bogotá: MEN. Retrieved from https://www.mineducacion.gov.co/1759/w3-article-348154.html?_noredirect=1
dc.relation.references	Ministerio de Educación Nacional. (2004-2019). Programa Nacional de Bilingüismo. Bogotá: MEN.
dc.relation.references	Ministerio de Educación Nacional. (2019). Series de textos. Plan Nacional de Bilingüismo. Bogotá: MEN.
dc.relation.references	Ministerio de Educación Nacional. (2016). Way to go! 7th Grade. Bogotá: MEN.
dc.relation.references	Ministerio de Educación Nacional. (2016). English, please! 10th. Bogotá: MEN.
dc.relation.references	Ministerio de Educación Nacional. (2018) Educación inclusiva e intercultural. Bogotá: MEN. Retrieved from https://www.mineducacion.gov.co/1759/w3-article-340146.html
dc.relation.references	Ministerio de Educación Nacional. (2018). Enfoque e identidades de género para los lineamientos de política de educación superior inclusiva. Bogotá: MEN
dc.relation.references	Mojica, C. P., & Castañeda-Peña, H. (2017). A learning experience of the gender perspective in English teaching contexts. Profile Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development, 19(1), 139-153. DOI: http://doi.org/10.15446/profile.v19n1.56209
dc.relation.references	Moosa-Mitha, M. (2005). A Difference-Centred Alternative to Theorization of Children's Citizenship Rights. Citizenship Studies, (9). DOI: http://doi.org/10.1080/13621020500211354
dc.relation.references	Mosquera, G., & González, M. (2015). Representaciones sociales de género en los textos escolares de las áreas de matemáticas y lenguaje, grado tercero de básica primaria. Bogotá: Universidad Libre.
dc.relation.references	Navarro, R., Martínez, V., Yubero, S., & Larrañaga, E. (2014). Impact of Gender and the Stereotyped Nature of Illustrations on Choice of Color: Replica of the Study by Karniol (2011) in a Spanish Sample. Gend. Issues. 31, 142-162. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s12147-014-9122-1
dc.relation.references	Neuman, W. L. (2006). Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Toronto: Pearson.
dc.relation.references	Norton, B. (2000). Identity and language learning: Gender, ethnicity, and educational change. Harlow: Pearson.
dc.relation.references	Nuñez, A. (2018). The English Textbooks. Tensions from an Intercultural perspective. Education and Learning Research Journal, Vol (17), 230-259. DOI:http://doi.org/10.26817/16925777.402
dc.relation.references	Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. (2014). Gender stereotypes and stereotyping and women’s rights. Switzerland: Palais des Nations
dc.relation.references	Organización de las Naciones Unidas (ONU). (2015) La igualdad de género. ONU Mujeres. México.
dc.relation.references	Otlowski, M. (2003). Ethnic Diversity and Gender Bias in EFL Textbooks. Asian EFL Journal 5, 2:1-15.
dc.relation.references	Patton, M. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. California: Sage Publications, Inc.
dc.relation.references	Plan Nacional Decenal de Educación (PNDE). (2016). III Comisión Nacional de Seguimiento. Balance sobre la ejecución al Plan Nacional Decenal de Educación 2006-2016. Pacto social por la educación. Segunda Oportunidad Desaprovechada. Colombia.
dc.relation.references	Pierce, B.N. (1990). Social identity, investment, and language learning. TESOL Quarterly, 24, 105-112.
dc.relation.references	Ravitch, D. (2003). The language police: How pressure groups restrict what students learn. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
dc.relation.references	Radic-Bojanic, B and Topalov, J. (2016). Textbooks in EFL classroom: defining, assessing, and analyzing. Kosovska Mitrovica: Faculty of Philosophy.
dc.relation.references	Ridgeway, C. L., & Bourg, C. (2004). “Gender as status: an expectation states theory approach,” The Psychology of Gender. New York: Guilford Press. 217–241.
dc.relation.references	Rixecker, S. (1994). Expanding the discursive context of policy design: A matter of feminist standpoint epistemology. Policy Sciences, 119–142.
dc.relation.references	Rojas, M. (2012). Female EFL teachers: shifting and multiple gender and language-learner identities. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, Vol (14), 92-107.
dc.relation.references	Sheldon, L. (1988). Evaluating ELT textbooks and materials. ELT Journal, 42(2), 237–246.
dc.relation.references	Simundic, A. (2013). Bias in research. Biochemia Médica. Biochemia Medica, Vol. 23 No. 1, 2013. DOI: http://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2013.003
dc.relation.references	Tashakkori, A., & Creswell, J. (2007). Editorial. New Era of Mixed Methods. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, Vol 1(1) 3–7.
dc.relation.references	Taylor, P.C., & Medina, M. N. (2013). Educational research paradigms: From positivism to multiparadigmatic. Journal for Meaning-Centered Education,1 (1).
dc.relation.references	Tomlinson, B. (2011). Materials Development in Language Teaching. New York: Cambridge University Press.
dc.relation.references	Turner-Bowker, D. (1996). Gender stereotyped descriptors in children's picture books: Does -Curious Jane‖ exist in literature? Sex Roles, 35(7/8), 461-488.
dc.relation.references	UNESCO. (2014). Plan de acción de la UNESCO para la prioridad “Igualdad de género” (2014-2021). París. Retrieved from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0022/002272/227222s.pdf
dc.relation.references	UNESCO. (2015). A guide for gender equality in teacher education policy and practices. Paris. Retrieved from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000231646
dc.relation.references	UNESCO. (2017). A guide for ensuring inclusion and equity in education. Paris. Retrieved from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000248254/PDF/248254eng.pdf.multi
dc.relation.references	UNESCO. (2018). Global education monitoring report gender review 2018: Meeting our commitments to gender equality in education. Paris. Retrieved from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000261593
dc.relation.references	Valverde, G., Bianchi, L., Wolfe, R., Schmidt, W., & Houang, R. (2002). According to the Book: Using TIMSS to Investigate the Translation of Policy into Practice through the World of Textbooks. London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
dc.relation.references	Van Craeynest, F. (2015).Gender representations in EFL textbooks: a quantitative and qualitative content analysis. Belgium: Universiteit Gent.
dc.relation.references	Wen-cheng, W., Chien-hung, L., Chung-chieh, L. (2010). Thinking of the textbook in the ESL/EFL classroom. Canada: Canadian Centre of Science and Education. Retrieved from http://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/25517958.pdf
dc.relation.references	Whitehead, D., & Schneider, Z. (2013). Mixed-methods research. Nursing & Midwifery Research: Methods and Appraisal for Evidence-Based Practice, (1), p. 263-384.
dc.relation.references	Wood, W., & Eagly, A.H. (2002). A cross-cultural analysis of the behavior of women and men: Implications for the origins of sex differences. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 699–727.
dc.relation.references	Young, I. M. (1990). Throwing Like a Girl and Other Essays in Feminist Philosophy and Social Theory. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
dc.publisher.faculty	Facultad de Humanidades	spa
dc.type.local	Tesis/Trabajo de grado - Monografía - Maestría	spa
dc.type.coar	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_bdcc	eng
dc.description.degreename	Magister en Enseñanza de Lenguas Extranjeras	spa
dc.description.degreelevel	Maestría	spa
dc.type.driver	info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis	eng
dc.identifier.instname	instname:Universidad Pedagógica Nacional	spa
dc.identifier.reponame	reponame: Repositorio Institucional UPN	spa
dc.identifier.repourl	repourl: http://repositorio.pedagogica.edu.co/
dc.title.translated	An EFL textbook content analysis : gender stereotypes and gender equality.	eng
dc.description.abstractenglish	This research project reports on a mixed (quantitative and qualitative) study conducted through a Content Analysis methodology under a critical feminist perspective. The main objective of this study was to analyze in terms of gender stereotypes the content (text and images) of the textbooks English, Please! 10th and Way to go 7th designed and published by the Colombian Ministry of Education. Data were collected and organized into grids and checklists previously piloted. The analysis conducted was composed of six different moments: unitizing, sampling, recording, reducing, inferring, and narrating.	eng
dc.type.version	info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dc.type.version	http://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aa
dc.rights.creativecommons	Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International