Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.advisorMontaño Moreno, Johannaspa
dc.contributor.authorEsquivel Gómez, Laura Milenaspa
dc.date.accessioned2019-09-12T14:08:02Z
dc.date.available2019-09-12T14:08:02Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.otherTE-23309
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12209/10368
dc.description.abstractEl presente trabajo de grado da cuenta de una investigación acción participativa en un aula de quinto grado del IED Domingo Faustino Sarmiento, sede B en la ciudad de Bogotá. Este proyecto se basó en la promoción de la participación y motivación de los estudiantes mediante el uso de la estrategia de gamificación en el aula con el fin de mejorar su interacción durante la clase de inglés como lengua extranjera. Lo anterior, dado que el diagnóstico reveló que la principal dificultad de los estudiantes era comunicarse usando la lengua extranjera. Como conclusión, se determinó que, mediante la estrategia de gamificación, los estudiantes encontraron una buena fuente de motivación para desarrollar sus habilidades de interacción en clase a través de las actividades planteadas que les permitieron acercarse a un uso real de la lengua conociendo su entorno y comunicando sus propias ideas.spa
dc.formatPDFspa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.language.isospa
dc.publisherUniversidad Pedagógica Nacionalspa
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.sourcereponame:Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Pedagógica Nacionalspa
dc.sourceinstname:Universidad Pedagógica Nacionalspa
dc.subjectGamificationspa
dc.subjectGame principlesspa
dc.subjectGame mechanicsspa
dc.subjectInteractionspa
dc.subjectEngagementspa
dc.subjectInvolvementspa
dc.titleGamification : a mission to foster students’ engagement and interaction in the EFL classroom.eng
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis
dc.publisher.programLicenciatura en Español e Inglésspa
dc.rights.accessAcceso abiertospa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.relation.referencesAllazzam, M. (2015). Learning from Dewey and Vygotsky Perspective. International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, 1854-1867.
dc.relation.referencesBlandford, A. (2013). Semi-Structured Qualitative Studies. The Encyclopedia of Human-Computer Interaction.
dc.relation.referencesBrown, H. (1994). Teaching by Principles. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
dc.relation.referencesBurke, B. (2014). Gamify: How gamification motivates people to do extraordinary things. Biblomotion.
dc.relation.referencesBurns, A. (2005). Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
dc.relation.referencesChou, Y.-K. (2013). Gamification Framework: Gamification & Behavioral Design. Retrieved from http://yukaichou.com/gamification-examples/octalysis-complete-gamification-framework/
dc.relation.referencesDarling, H., & McLaughlin. (1995). Policies that support professional development.
dc.relation.referencesDelgado, J., & Chapetón, M. (2015). Getting the Picture of Iconography: An innovative way to teach English to young learners. Bogotá: Aula.
dc.relation.referencesDenzin, N., & Lincoln. (2005). Handbook of qualitative research. California: Thousand Oaks.
dc.relation.referencesDinçer, A., Yeşilyurt, S., & Demiröz, H. (2017). Multidimensional classroom engagement in EFL contexts. Turkey.
dc.relation.referencesDornyei, Z. (2001). Motivational Strategies in the Language Classroom. Cambridge Language Teaching Library.
dc.relation.referencesDriscoll, D. (2011). Introduction to Primary Research:. Writing spaces : readings on writing.
dc.relation.referencesEllis, R., & Barkhuizen, G. (2005). Analyzing Learner Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
dc.relation.referencesEmerson, R., Shaw, L., & Fretz, R. (1995). Writing Ethnographic Field Notes. Contemporary Sociology.
dc.relation.referencesEurope, C. o. (2011). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR). Retrieved from https://www.coe.int/en/web/common-european-framework-reference-languages/levels
dc.relation.referencesGarland, C. (2015). Gamification and Implications for Second. St. Cloud State University.
dc.relation.referencesGoleman, D. (1995). Emotional Intelligence. New York: Bantam Books.
dc.relation.referencesGrund, K. (2015). How game and game elements facilitate learning: a literary review. Lecture Notes in Informatics, University of Ausburg, 1279-1293.
dc.relation.referencesHalliday, M. (1979). El lenguaje como semiótica social: la interpretación social del lenguaje y del significado. México : Fondo de Cultura Económica.
dc.relation.referencesHerazo, J. (2010). Authentic Oral Interaction in the EFL Class:. Profile: Issues in Teachers´ Professional Development, 47-61.
dc.relation.referencesHernández, D. (1993). El currículo: una construcción permanente. Revista Educación y Cultura. CEID-FECODE.
dc.relation.referencesHine, G. (2013). The importance of action research in teacher education. Issues in Educational Research, 151-163.
dc.relation.referencesHoyo, M., & Allen, D. (2006). The Use of Triangulation Methods in. Journal of College Science Teaching, 42-47.
dc.relation.referencesKapp, K. (2012). The Gamification of Learning and Instruction: Game-based Methods and Strategies for Training and Education. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer.
dc.relation.referencesMartin, J., & Torres, A. (2016). What is student engagement and why is it important? National Association of Independent Schools.
dc.relation.referencesMEN. (2006). Publicaciones: Ministerio de Educación Nacional. Retrieved from https://www.mineducacion.gov.co/1759/w3-article-115174.html?_noredirect=1
dc.relation.referencesMohseni, A., & Rahmanpanah, H. (2017). Engagement and Motivation in EFL Classroom: Humanizing the Coursebook. journal of Language and Translation, 69-88.
dc.relation.referencesMorris, M., Leung, K., Ames, D., & Lickel, B. (1999). Views from inside and outside: integrating emic and etic insights about culture and justice judgment. Academy of Managment Review, 781-796.
dc.relation.referencesMoyal, D. (Without date). Coming to Language: Wittgentein's Social "Theory" of Language Acquisition. 291-313.
dc.relation.referencesNorton, B., & Toohey, K. (2001). Changing perspectives on good language learners. TESOL Quarterly, 307-322.
dc.relation.referencesOxford, A. (2016). OXAN. Retrieved from https://www.worldgovernmentsummit.org/api/publications/document?id=2b0d6ac4-e97c-6578-b2f8-ff0000a7ddb6
dc.relation.referencesParkinson, G., & Drislane, R. (2011). Online dictionary of the social sciences. Retrieved from http://bitbucket.icaap.org/dict.pl
dc.relation.referencesPink, D. (2009). Drive: The Surprising Truth About What Motivates Us. Riverhead Books.
dc.relation.referencesReeve, J. (2009). Understanding motivation and emotion. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
dc.relation.referencesReeve, J. (2012). A Self-determination Theory Perspective on Student Engagement. Handbook of Research on Student Engagement, 149-172.
dc.relation.referencesSarmiento, I. D. (n.d.). Principios Institucionales: Dofasa. Retrieved from https://dofasa2017.webnode.com.co/principios-institucionales/
dc.relation.referencesShpancer, N. (2004). What Makes Classroom Learning a Worthwhile Experience? The Nea Higher Education Journal, 23-35.
dc.relation.referencesSkinner, E., Kindermann, T., & Furrer, C. (2009). A Motivational Perspective on Engagement and Disaffection. Educational and Phsychological Measurement, 493-525.
dc.relation.referencesTriana, J. (2014). Gamification: Gameful Design of Engaging Environments and Activities for Communicative Skills. Bogotá: Universidad Pedagógica Nacional.
dc.relation.referencesVygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: the development of higher psychological processes. United States of America: Harvard University Press.
dc.relation.referencesWillig, C. (2013). Introducing Qualitative Research in Psychology. New York: Open University Press.
dc.relation.referencesYi, F. (2006). EFL classroom management: Creating a positive climate for learning. Retrieved from wlkc.nbu.edu.cn/jpkc_nbu/daxueyingyu/download/013.pdf
dc.relation.referencesYufrizal, H. (2001). Negotiation of Meaning and Language Acquisition by Indonesia EFL Learners. TEFLIN Journal, 60-87.
dc.relation.referencesZhang, S. (2009). The Role of Input, Interaction and Output in the Development of Oral Fluency. English Language Teaching, 91-100.
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Humanidadesspa
dc.type.localTesis/Trabajo de grado - Monografía – Pregradospa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_7a1feng
dc.description.degreenameLicenciado en Español e Inglésspa
dc.description.degreelevelTesis de pregradospa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesiseng
dc.identifier.instnameinstname:Universidad Pedagógica Nacionalspa
dc.identifier.instnameinstname:Universidad Pedagógica Nacionalspa
dc.identifier.reponamereponame: Repositorio Institucional UPNspa
dc.identifier.repourlrepourl: http://repositorio.pedagogica.edu.co/
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dc.type.versionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aa
dc.rights.creativecommonsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/